uid=AND,o=lter,dc=ecoinformatics,dc=org all public read SA021 Bruce P. McCune

Oregon State University;Dept. of Botany & Plant Pathology;4575 SW Research Way; Research Way Lab Building; Corvallis OR 97333 USA

(541) 737-1741 mccuneb@oregonstate.edu https://bmccune.weebly.com/ Shanti D. Berryman

Botany and Plant Pathology ;Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 USA

berryman@fastmail.fm berrymas@onid.orst.edu Shanti D. Berryman

Botany and Plant Pathology ;Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 USA

berryman@fastmail.fm berrymas@onid.orst.edu Bruce P. McCune

Oregon State University;Dept. of Botany & Plant Pathology;4575 SW Research Way; Research Way Lab Building; Corvallis OR 97333 USA

(541) 737-1741 mccuneb@oregonstate.edu https://bmccune.weebly.com/ Principal Investigator Bruce P. McCune

Oregon State University;Dept. of Botany & Plant Pathology;4575 SW Research Way; Research Way Lab Building; Corvallis OR 97333 USA

(541) 737-1741 mccuneb@oregonstate.edu https://bmccune.weebly.com/ Creator Shanti D. Berryman

Botany and Plant Pathology ;Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 USA

berryman@fastmail.fm berrymas@onid.orst.edu Creator 2014-01-08 Epiphytic macrolichen communities were sampled in 117 coniferous stands in Blue River watershed of western Oregon. Stands were sampled across various stand types defined by stand structure, according to age classes of the younger tree cohort and remnant tree retention. Remnant trees were those in an older cohort that remained following a stand disturbance that initiated tree regeneration, such as a timber harvest or natural forest fire. Stands were located in upland and riparian forests of two vascular plant series (western hemlock and true fir). Presence and abundance of all epiphytic macrolichen species were sampled in a 0.4 ha circular Forest Health Monitoring (FHM) plot in the 117 stands. Epiphytic lichen biomass (oven-dried, kg/ha) was estimated for three functional groups: nitrogen-fixing cyanolichens, forage lichens, and matrix lichens in 63 of the 117 stands. stand structure populations history fires biomass community composition plant species composition topography resource management forests old growth forests lichens LTER controlled vocabulary Adaptive Management Areas (AMA) forest management mature forests young forests epiphytes fire history Andrews Experimental Forest site thesaurus populations LTER core research areas OTHER RELATED REFERENCES: Campbell, J., S.K Stevenson, and D.S. Coxson. 1999. Estimating epiphyte abundance in high-elevation forests of northern British Columbia. Selbeyana 20: 261-267. Esseen, P.-A. 1985. Litter fall of epiphytic macrolichens in two old Picea abies forests in Sweden. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 980-987. Logan, S.A., M.A. Hemstrom and W. Paulat. 1987. Plant association and management guide: Willamette National Forest. USDA Forest Service, R6-ECOL-TP. Portland, Oregon, USA. McCune, B. and L. Geiser. 1997. Macrolichens of the Pacific Northwest. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, OR, US. McCune, B., J. Dey, J. Peck, D. Cassell, K. Heiman, S. Will-Wolf, and P. Neitlich. 1997. Repeatability of community data: species richness versus gradient scores in large-scale lichen studies. The Bryologist 100: 40-46. McCune, B. and D. Keon. 2002. Equations for potential direct incident radiation and heat load. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 603-606. McCune, B. and M.J. Mefford. 2004. HyperNiche. Nonparametric Multiplicative Habitat Modeling. Version 1.0. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon, U.S.A. Rosso, A.L., B. McCune and T.R. Rambo. 2000. Ecology and conservation of rare, old-growth-associated canopy lichen in a silvicultural landscape. The Bryologist 103: 117-127. Sillett, S.C. and M.N. Goslin. 1999. Distribution of epiphytic macrolichens in relation to remnant trees in a multiple-age Douglas-fir forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29: 1204-1215. Stevenson, S.K. and J.A. Rochelle. 1984. Lichen litterfall—its availability and utilization by black-tailed deer, pp. 391-396. In: Meehan, W.R. et al. (eds), Fish and Wildlife Relationships in Old-growth Forests: Proceedings of a symposium held in Juneau, AK, 12-15 April 1982. American Institute of Fishery Research Biologists. Stevenson, S.K., A.N. Lance and H.M. Armleder. 1998. Estimating the abundance of arboreal forage lichens: User’s guide. B.C. Ministry of Forests, Land Management Handbook Field Guide Insert 7. Victoria, BC, Canada. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of the Interior. 2001 Record of Decision for amendments to the survey and manage, protection buffer, and other mitigation measures standards and guidelines. Regional Ecosystem Office, Portland, OR. This dissertation is part of the multidisciplinary Blue River Landscape Project (LP) in the Central Cascades Adaptive Management Area (AMA), which encompasses the Blue River watershed. Related PublicationsNeitlich, Peter N. 1993. Lichen abundance and biodiversity along a chronosequence from young managed stands to ancient forest. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont. 90 p. M.S. thesis.McCune, Bruce; Hutchinson, Jenifer; Berryman, Shanti. 2002. Concentration of rare epiphytic lichens along large streams in a mountainous watershed in Oregon, U.S.A. The Bryologist. 105(3): 439-450.McCune, Bruce; Berryman, Shanti D.; Cissel, John H.; Gitelman, Alix I. 2003. Use of a smoother to forecast occurrence of epiphytic lichens under alternative forest management plans. Ecological Applications. 13(4): 1110-1123.Berryman, Shanti D. 2002. Epiphytic macrolichens in relation to forest management and topography in a western Oregon watershed. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University. 153 p. Ph.D. dissertation.Berryman, Shanti; McCune, Bruce. 2006. Epiphytic lichens along gradients in topography and stand structure in western Oregon, USA. Pacific Northwest Fungi. 1(2): 1-38. Data Use Agreement: The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. This Data Set is released under the Creative Commons license CC BY "Attribution" (see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Creative Commons license CC BY - Attribution is a license that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work (even commercially), as long as you are credited for the original creation. This license accommodates maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. It is considered professional conduct and an ethical obligation to acknowledge the work of other scientists. The Data User is asked to provide attribution of the original work if this data package is shared in whole or by individual parts or used in the derivation of other products. A recommended citation is provided for each Data Set in the Andrews LTER data catalog (see: http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/catalog/datacatalog.aspx). A generic citation is also provided for this Data Set on the website https://portal.edirepository.org in the summary metadata page. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed and all data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. General acknowledgement: Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/abstract.aspx?dbcode=SA021 Blue River Watershed -122.34493256 -122.00000000 44.39608383 44.00000000 457 1469 meter 1997-09-23 1999-09-15 All Organisms All Organisms Family Non-taxonomic objects (vegetative, organic, or inorganic) Species Snag Highest common category (ca. kingdom) Plantae Division or Phylum Coniferophyta Class Pinopsida Order Taxales Family Taxaceae Genus Taxus Species Taxus brevifolia Order Pinales Family Pinaceae Genus Tsuga Species Tsuga heterophylla Species Tsuga mertensiana Genus Pinus Species Pinus monticola Genus Abies Species Abies procera Species Abies amabilis Species Abies grandis Genus Pseudotsuga Species Pseudotsuga menziesii Family Cupressaceae Genus Thuja Species Thuja plicata Division or Phylum Magnoliophyta Class Magnoliopsida Subclass Hamamelididae Order Fagales Family Fagaceae Genus Chrysolepis Species Castanopsis chrysophylla Family Betulaceae Genus Alnus Species Alnus rubra Species Alnus sinuata Subclass Rosidae Order Cornales Family Cornaceae Genus Cornus Species Cornus nuttallii Order Sapindales Family Aceraceae Genus Acer Species Acer macrophyllum Subclass Dilleniidae Order Salicales Family Salicaceae Genus Populus Species Populus deltoides Species Populus trichocarpa Species Populus tremuloides Class Liliopsida Subclass Asteridae Order Dipsacales Family Caprifoliaceae Genus Linnaea Species Linnaea borealis Subclass Commelinidae Order Cyperales Family Cyperaceae Genus Carex Species Carex deweyana Highest common category (ca. kingdom) Lichen Genus Leptogium Species Leptogium cyanescens Species Leptogium polycarpum Genus Xanthoria Species Xanthoria polycarpa Genus Usnea Species Usnea substerilis Species Usnea glabrescens Species Usnea filipendula Species Usnea cornuta Species Usnea wirthii Species Usnea chaetophora Species Usnea diplotypus Species Usnea glabrata Species Usnea scabrata Genus Sphaerophorus Species Sphaerophorus globosus Genus Pseudocyphellaria Species Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis Species Pseudocyphellaria anthraspis Species Pseudocyphellaria anomala Species Pseudocyphellaria crocata Genus Platismatia Species Platismatia norvegica Species Platismatia glauca Species Platismatia herrei Species Platismatia stenophylla Genus Peltigera Species Peltigera collina Species Peltigera britannica Genus Parmeliopsis Species Parmeliopsis ambigua Species Parmeliopsis hyperopta Genus Nephroma Species Nephroma resupinatum Species Nephroma occultum Species Nephroma helveticum Species Nephroma bellum Species Nephroma laevigatum Species Nephroma parile Genus Melanelia Species Melanelia fuliginosa Species Melanelia multispora Species Melanelia elegantula Species Melanelia exasperatula Species Melanelia subaurifera Genus Hypotrachyna Species Hypotrachyna sinuosa Genus Evernia Species Evernia prunastri Genus Cladonia Species Cladonia carneola Species Cladonia squamosa Species Cladonia squamosa var. subsquamosa Species Cladonia fimbriata Species Cladonia coniocraea Species Cladonia ochrochlora Species Cladonia transcendens Species Cladonia albonigra Species Cladonia norvegica Species Cladonia umbricola Genus Cavernularia Species Cavernularia hultenii Genus Alectoria Species Alectoria vancouverensis Species Alectoria imshaugii Species Alectoria sarmentosa Genus Melanelia Species Melanelia fuliginosa Species Melanelia multispora Species Melanelia elegantula Species Melanelia exasperatula Species Melanelia subaurifera Genus Bryoria Species Bryoria mystery olive sp. Species Bryoria trichodes Species Bryoria glabra Species Bryoria pseudofuscescens Species Bryoria friabilis Species Bryoria capillaris Species Bryoria fremontii Species Bryoria fuscescens Species Bryoria tortuosa Genus Candelaria Species Candelaria concolor Genus Cetraria Species Cetraria subalpina Species Cetraria pallidula Species Cetraria chlorophylla Species Cetraria canadensis Species Cetraria orbata Species Cetraria platyphylla Species Cetraria merrillii Genus Hypogymnia Species Hypogymnia rugosa Species Hypogymnia oceanica Species Hypogymnia metaphysodes Species Hypogymnia imshaugii Species Hypogymnia apinnata Species Hypogymnia enteromorpha Species Hypogymnia inactiva Species Hypogymnia occidentalis Species Hypogymnia physodes Species Hypogymnia tubulosa Genus Letharia Species Letharia vulpina Species Letharia columbiana Genus Lobaria Species Lobaria pulmonaria Species Lobaria oregana Species Lobaria scrobiculata Genus Physcia Species Physcia aipolia Species Physcia adscendens Species Physcia tenella Genus Ramalina Species Ramalina dilacerata Species Ramalina farinacea Genus Sticta Species Sticta limbata Species Sticta fuliginosa Species Sticta weigelii Genus Nodobryoria Species Nodobryoria oregana Species Nodobryoria abbreviata Genus Esslingeriana Species Esslingeriana idahoensis Genus Vulpicida Species Vulpicida canadensis Highest common category (ca. kingdom) Fungi Division or Phylum Ascomycota Class Lecanoromycetes Order Lecanorales Family Pannariaceae Genus Pannaria Species Pannaria leucostictoides Species Pannaria saubinetii Family Parmeliaceae Genus Parmelia Species Parmelia saxatilis Species Parmelia hygrophila Species Parmelia pseudosulcata Species Parmelia sulcata This data was collected as part of a PhD dissertation to describe patterns in epiphytic macrolichen community composition, diversity, and biomass across various stand types in the Blue River watershed of western Oregon. The dissertation first examines the relative importance of ecological factors such as stand age, remnant tree retention, and topography to lichen communities in the landscape. It then develops models for estimating epiphytic macrolichen biomass and uses these models to assess potential impacts of forest management strategies on future lichen biomass in the watershed.

An update history is logged and maintained with each new version of every dataset.

notPlanned Original entry into SQL of upper level metadata via administrative interface. Version1 2007-10-04 Entity and attribute metadata moved from Excel spreadsheets using move_xls. Data QA/QC checked and appended into SQL. Data is online for entities 1-4. Entity 5 still needs some work. Version2 2007-10-09 Information Manager

Andrews Forest LTER Program US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis OR 97331

hjaweb@fsl.orst.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Shanti D. Berryman

Botany and Plant Pathology ;Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331 USA

berryman@fastmail.fm berrymas@onid.orst.edu Andrews Forest LTER Site

Forest Ecosystems and Society Department in Forestry Oregon State University 201K Richardson Hall Corvallis OR 97331-5752

(541) 737-8480 lterweb@fsl.orst.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Field Methods - SA021 Stand Selection and Plot Installation We located stand types described above from aerial photos. Most stands were within the Blue River watershed, however some stands were located outside of the watershed, but still on the Willamette National Forest and within the AMA boundaries (Berryman 2002). Stands sampled outside of the Blue River watershed represented stand types that were scarce or absent in the watershed. Stands were sampled in the summers of 1997-1999 using one permanent plot (34.7 m radius, 0.4 ha) per stand following the FHM plot methodology (McCune et al. 1997b). A total of 117 plots were permanently installed for this study. Once the stand was located on the ground, a reference point (RP) was established along the road to assist in future plot relocation. From the RP (typically a tree) we chose an approximate azimuth into the stand. The RP was labeled with metal tags indicating the azimuth and distance to plot center. This azimuth was followed for 46.0 m (not slope-corrected) plus a two-digit random integer. Plot center was located no less than 46.0 m from: designated reserve areas in timber sales (other than stream buffers); the stand edge; roads; campgrounds; and power lines. Failing this, another random number was chosen and the same azimuth was followed until plot center was located outside of these exclusive areas and at least within 46.0 m of the stand edge. Riparian plots were installed to border the stream edge. Plot center was marked with steel rebar and PVC pipe to increase the possibility of plot relocation after major disturbances, such as a fire or timber harvest. Three RP trees near plot center were tagged to reference the plot center with an azimuth and distance to facilitate relocation Lichen Community Survey The Forest Health Monitoring (FHM) lichen method was used to sample lichen communities in each stand. These data will be used as a baseline for long-term monitoring of lichen communities in the managed landscape. In each FHM plot, the surveyor completed a maximum two-hour ocular lichen community survey. The survey method consisted of two parts performed simultaneously (McCune et al. 1997): 1. The field surveyor used a field check list of easily identifiable lichens in the field and sometimes collected voucher specimens of these species. Voucher specimens were collected for all other species that could not be easily identified in the field. The collection represented the species diversity and composition of epiphytic macrolichens in the plot as fully as possible. The population sampled consisted of all macrolichens occurring on woody plants, excluding the 0.5 m basal portions of trees and shrubs below 0.5 m. Given the large plot area, lichen litter and fallen branches provided a sample of the canopy lichens. 2. The abundance of each species was estimated using a five-step scale (modified from McCune et al. 1997): 0 = absent; 1 = rare (less than 3 individuals per plot); 2 = uncommon (4-10 individuals per plot); 3 = common (greater than10, but less than 40 individuals per plot); 4 = very common (greater than 40 individuals per plot, but less than half of the available substrate was covered by the species); 5 = abundant (more than half of the available substrate had the species present). The FHM method has been used to sample lichen communities in over 1,000 plots for the FHM program nationwide (McCune 2000) and has been used by the Pacific Northwest Forest Service Air Quality Biomonitoring Project for nearly 1,000 lichen community plots in Oregon and Washington (L. Geiser, unpublished data). Field methods have been documented for repeatability and quality assurance and are described in McCune et al. (1997). Lichen Biomass Sampling We estimated epiphytic lichen biomass from lichen litterfall on the forest floor in litter plots, sub-sampled in each stand. Epiphytic lichen biomass includes all epiphytic lichens growing on boles and branches of trees and tall shrubs. Collecting lichen litter in late summer (late August through October) avoids the large and variable amounts of litter that can occur in winter months due to large storm events (Stevenson and Rochelle 1984; Esseen 1985). Late summer litter does not represent annual litterfall because lichen litter in the forests of the western Cascades is eaten and decomposes rapidly (McCune and Daly 1994). However, such samples can be used to estimate epiphytic lichen biomass at the stand level (Neitlich 1993; McCune 1994; Peck and McCune 1997; Sillett and Goslin 1999). Annual variation in litterfall is one source of error in such estimates. Hence, this method should be based on samples collected during one late-summer period and is best used for estimating large relative differences in epiphytic lichen biomass among stands over a large area (McCune 1994). Lichen litter was collected in a minimum of one stand per stand type. Of the 117 stands in which we collected lichen community data, we sampled 63 stands for lichen litter biomass. The 63 stands were chosen to include the full range of stand types included in the 117 stands. In each stand, epiphytic macrolichen litter was sampled in 2 m radius circular plots ("litter plots"). Depending on the stand age and complexity of canopy structure, ten to fifteen litter plots were sampled for each stand (McCune 1994). Stands with obviously low lichen biomass (e.g., even-aged young stands, less than 20 yr) were sampled with ten litter plots. Old growth (greater than 200 yr), mature stands (81-200 yr), and most stands with remnants were sampled with 15 litter plots. Litter plots were placed along three transects per stand at randomly selected intervals, but constrained to 12-30 m between plots (two transects if sampling only ten litter plots). Transects were established parallel to the contour, intersecting the FHM plot center for the first transect. The other two transects were parallel to the first, separated by 12 m. This achieved interspersion throughout the stand. Some litter plots were placed outside of the FHM plot boundaries, though still within the stand. Five litter plots were sampled per transect. Epiphytic macrolichens were divided into three functional groups based on their roles in the forest ecosystem (McCune 1993). These groups include "cyanolichens," which consist of all nitrogen-fixing lichens with cyanobacteria present as either the primary or secondary photobiont; the major contributors to this group included primarily Lobaria oregana and to a lesser degree L. pulmonaria. "Forage lichens" consist of all pendulous fruticose lichens. These are used for forage by wildlife, primarily the genera Usnea, Alectoria, and Bryoria. "Matrix lichens" account for all remaining green-algal macrolichens, primarily foliose in growth form, most commonly Platismatia and Hypogymnia. We modified McCune’s (1994) litter-pickup method for estimating stand-level lichen biomass to expedite sampling across many stands at the landscape scale. The "reference method" was developed based on visual biomass estimates of thalli to sample lichen litter from the forest floor more rapidly, while maintaining a similar level of accuracy to that obtained with the litter-pickup method. The visual estimates of lichen biomass were made using reference lichen samples for calibration. This method was adapted from Rosso et al. (2000) and Campbell et al. (1999), in which they visually estimated biomass of lichens and bryophytes in the forest canopy using air-dried reference samples for calibration. The reference method is also a modification of the abundance classes (defined by grams of lichen) used by Stevenson et al. (1998) to estimate arboreal forage lichen biomass. We modified these approaches to visually estimate lichen litter biomass by functional group on the forest floor. We estimated lichen litter biomass during the late summers of 1997–1999, during which each of the 63 stands was sampled once for lichen litter. Within each litter plot, oven-dried samples from each functional group (0.1, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0 g) were used as references for calibrating estimates of lichen litter biomass in the field. To assess reliability of the method, estimates from the reference method were calibrated against true litter-pickup masses for one litter plot in each of 16 different stands. Two field collectors calibrated their biomass estimates from the lichen litter plot to true lichen masses (16 litter plots per field collector). The “picked-up” specimens were air-dried, then oven-dried at 60°C for 24 hours, and then weighed to the nearest milligram in the lab. Daily calibrations were also made between estimates of biomass for individual clumps of lichen litter and true lichen masses for each functional group. These calibrations allowed field collectors to gauge the accuracy of their litter estimates. We also calibrated litter estimates between field collectors to improve precision of the estimates. Lichen biomass data was entered at the sub-plot level for each stand. Data were cross-checked once for data entry errors. Lichen biomass data were averaged across all subplots by functional group for each stand, resulting in one mean biomass value at the stand level for each functional group: cyanolichen, matrix lichen and forage lichen. Stand Measurements and Derived Stand Variables At each stand, basic plot level information was recorded and the “stand type” for the plot was classified. Plot level information included: the date of sampling (note that all measurements for a plot were taken in one day, including lichen communities, lichen biomass, overstory trees and plot data); latitude and longitude coordinates and elevation (m) were taken from the GPS unit at plot center; percent slope was taken at plot center (averaging both up-hill and down-hill measurements using a clinometer); aspect was taken at plot center (degrees east of true north using a compass); topographic position of the stand in relation to the surrounding landscape was classified; and a code of 0 or 1 was assigned if lichen biomass was collected (0=no biomass, 1=lichen biomass was collected). To classify the “stand type” we verified and recorded information for four main attributes. The overall vascular plant series for the FHM plot was determined using the Willamette National Forest Plant Association and Management Guide (Logan et. al. 1987), and the topographic position was recorded (upland or riparian intermittent stream, riparian perennial fish-bearing stream or riparian perennial non fish-bearing stream). The age class of the younger cohort was estimated for the stand, or, if the age class was difficult to determine, we cored representative trees to better estimate stand age. Old growth was defined as stands greater than 200 yr with highly variable canopy layers. Total percent canopy cover of remnant trees was used as an estimate of total percent retention of remnants for a stand. We estimated canopy cover of remnants in the field from dbh and crown width. J. Mayo (unpublished data) developed a table for estimating canopy cover of trees from dbh. This table is based on the relationship of dbh to crown width, from which percent canopy cover by each remnant tree was calculated. Remnants were typically Pseudotsuga menziesii, and in some cases Tsuga heterophylla, Thuja plicata, or Abies procera. Remnant tree age was not measured. We calculated the heat load index and potential direct incident radiation for each stand. The heat load index represents the amount of heat a site potentially receives and is derived from models based on latitude, slope, and aspect (McCune and Keon 2002). Potential direct incident radiation (MJ/cm2/yr) represents the amount of light a site potentially receives, and is also derived from latitude, slope, and aspect. Basal Area and Overstory Tree Measurements Overstory basal area (BA) was measured with an angle gauge (note: a relescope was used in 1997 only) in five variable-radius subplots within each stand: one at plot center and the other four at 23.0 m in each cardinal direction from plot center (subplot labels were: plot center=1, N=2, E=3, S=4, W=5). A consistent BA factor (BAF) was used for all subplots within one stand, though the factor varied across all stands, depending on tree size and density. The goal for repeatability of BA was a standard error of less than 15% of the mean. Stand basal area (BA, m2/ha) was measured for all live and dead trees, separating hardwoods and conifers. However, at two plots (SB14 and SB17) we were unable to perform BA measurements because the stand was very young and dense (i.e., dog-hair stand). Instead, we did a count of trees per 1/10 acre for each subplot and no BAF was used. BA calculations for the plot level were made by averaging BA data across the 5 subplots to generate six BA variables as the plot level: total BA of live trees, basal area of conifers, BA of conifers, BA of hardwoods, BA of dead trees, and BA of remnants. In addition, we calculated the percent total BA that was comprised of remnant trees in the stand. All overstory trees that were accounted for in the BA variable-radius subplots (or those trees that were “in”) were measured. Overstory tree measurements included: identifying species (species acronym recorded); forestry assessment of tree condition class; diameter at breast height (dbh); percent ratio of live crown class; and assignment of crown class (note: see class code descriptions in metadata file). Crown width was measured only for remnant trees, measured from the center of the tree bole, out to the tip of the crown edge (estimating by looking up). The longest branch was the starting point for measuring the crown width. Taxonomic Procedures - SA021 Laboratory Species Identification Methods and Data Entry All lichen vouchers collected in the field were identified in the laboratory by Shanti Berryman, with the assistance of Dr. Bruce McCune. Lichen nomenclature followed McCune and Geiser (1997), and McCune’s key (2002, http://oregonstate.edu/~mccuneb/Usnea.PDF) to the genus Usnea in the Pacific Northwest. Thin layer chromatography was performed when necessary for identification. In addition, some specimens were sent to lichen specialists for verification. Representative voucher specimens were curated and deposited in the Oregon State University Herbarium (OSC). All lichen community data were recorded on FHM lichen identification data sheets during identification in the laboratory and data were entered using compact format (text file; McCune and Mefford 1999) for PCORD using lichen species codes from the FHM lichen program species list. Duplicate collections of species at a given plot were combined following the FHM lichen program protocol (http://www.fia.fs.fed.us/library/field-guides-methods-proc/). All lichen community data entries were cross-checked once for data entry errors. The study site is located in the Blue River watershed of the Central Cascades Adaptive Management Area (AMA) in the Willamette National Forest, Oregon. Sampling frequency: one-time sampling Study Area The study site is located in the Blue River watershed of the Central Cascades Adaptive Management Area (AMA) in the Willamette National Forest, Oregon. Stands were sampled between 44.0 and 44.5 degrees N, and 122.0 and 123.0 degrees W. The Blue River watershed consists of 23,900 ha of conifer-dominated forest on steep volcanic terrain of the Cascade Mountain Range, ranging from 317 – 1,639 m in elevation (Cissel et al. 1999; Figure 1). Annual precipitation averages 220 cm (ranging from 55 to 361 cm), deposited as rain or snow in higher elevations, mainly between October and April. The winters are mild and wet with average temperature of 2 degrees C in January (ranging from -1.5 to 7.3 degrees C), and the summers are warm and dry with average temperature of 19 degrees C in July (ranging from 15 to 22 degrees C). The northern section of the watershed consists of a narrow band of high elevation, Abies amabilis (Dougl.) Forbes (Pacific silver fir) and Abies procera Rheder (Noble fir) dominated forest (hereafter, “true fir series;” Logan et al. 1987). Most of the watershed is lower elevation forest dominated by Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco. (Douglas fir) and Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. (western hemlock; hereafter, “western hemlock series;” Logan et al. 1987). The Blue River watershed has had decades of fire suppression and timber extraction. Historical fire regimes varied in frequency and severity within the watershed (Weisberg 1998). Forests in true fir series burned infrequently (mean fire interval of 260 yr), but fires were severe with high mortality (greater than 80%). The fire return interval for the western hemlock series ranged from 100 to 180 yr with less severe burns (40-80% mortality). Consequently, forests in the two plant series will be managed differently in the Blue River watershed, as part of the Landscape Plan (LP) which is an adaptive management approach using historical fire history as reference for management (Cissel et al. 1999). Sample Design Lichen communities were sampled in forest stands according to a stratified random design. Forest stands were stratified by four attributes, modified from Cissel et al. (1999; Figure 2): two plant series (western hemlock and true fir), plant series were determined based on the key to climax vegetation, Logan et al. 1987; four age classes (the younger tree cohort; young less than 20 yr, pole 21-80 yr, mature 81-200 yr; and old growth greater than 200 yr); four classes of remnant retention based on the percent canopy cover of remnant trees that survived from the previous stand, following a disturbance that initiated tree regeneration: 0 = 0 - 7.5%; 15 = 7.5 - 22.5%; 30 = 22.5 - 37.0%; 50 = 37.0 - 62.0%. Remnant trees included the older live trees that remained following the most recent timber harvest or those old trees that survived a natural forest fire. The characteristics of remnant trees (i.e., size, crown structure) varied among stands because remnants from a timber harvest were often smaller and younger than those remnants surviving forest fires. Old-growth stands were not stratified by remnant classes. Only 0% and 15% retention classes were sampled in the true fir series, since future management strategies will prescribe only these retention levels in the true fir series (Cissel et al. 1999); four topographic classes (upland, and three riparian stream classes: intermittent; perennial non fish-bearing; and perennial fish-bearing). We adopted these stream classes from the LP management strategy to strengthen the link between our results and management activities. Upland stands were at least two tree-heights (about 105 m) from perennial streams (hereafter referred to as “perennial fish-bearing”) and one tree-height (about 52 m) from all other streams (USDA and USDI 2001). Riparian stands were defined as having some part of the stream within or immediately bordering the plot boundary. Intermittent streams formed narrow channels and the stream-bank vegetation was similar to that of upland slopes. Perennial streams formed wider channels and vegetation along the stream banks was characteristic of riparian areas, including hardwood trees and shrubs. We were unable to identify stands along perennial streams with a definite remnant cohort; therefore, these stands were stratified by the age-class of the co-dominant tree cohort, ignoring the remnant stratum (Figure 2). The design yielded 34 possible stand types for the western hemlock series and 22 for the true fir series, of which we sought to sample three stands each. However, some stand types were sampled with fewer stands or were not sampled due to their scarcity or absence in the landscape (such as stands with remnant retention greater than or equal to 30%). The 50% remnant retention class was uncommon in the landscape at the time of sampling and was therefore under-represented compared to other retention classes. The 50% retention class will become more prominent in the future landscape as managed under the LP (Cissel et al. 1999). We sampled 27 stand types in the western hemlock series, 6 of which were sampled with less than 3 stands. In the true fir series we sampled 18 stand types, 10 of which were sampled with less than 3 stands. Cascade Mountains, Oregon and Washington -122.65947700 -122.27221300 41.90189100 48.91215300 4392 4392 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 001 -122.29175568 -122.29175568 44.16998291 44.16998291 579 579 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 002 -122.29055786 -122.29055786 44.27072144 44.27072144 1219 1219 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 003 -122.29241943 -122.29241943 44.27050018 44.27050018 1219 1219 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 004 -122.29086304 -122.29086304 44.20035934 44.20035934 732 732 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 005 -122.18629456 -122.18629456 44.26362610 44.26362610 975 975 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 006 -122.17684937 -122.17684937 44.26370621 44.26370621 944 944 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 007 -122.29058075 -122.29058075 44.17016602 44.17016602 616 616 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 008 -122.20070648 -122.20070648 44.24137497 44.24137497 652 652 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 009 -122.18013763 -122.18013763 44.29330444 44.29330444 841 841 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 010 -122.16423035 -122.16423035 44.33226013 44.33226013 1438 1438 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 011 -122.15890503 -122.15890503 44.33200455 44.33200455 1347 1347 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 012 -122.14258575 -122.14258575 44.32363129 44.32363129 1274 1274 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 013 -122.17074585 -122.17074585 44.33066177 44.33066177 1463 1463 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 014 -122.13056946 -122.13056946 44.31846237 44.31846237 1158 1158 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 015 -122.25061798 -122.25061798 44.21623230 44.21623230 469 469 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 016 -122.16779327 -122.16779327 44.28850555 44.28850555 896 896 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 017 -122.13489532 -122.13489532 44.33080673 44.33080673 1188 1188 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 018 -122.21879578 -122.21879578 44.32557678 44.32557678 1188 1188 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 019 -122.22137451 -122.22137451 44.30754852 44.30754852 890 890 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 020 -122.22398376 -122.22398376 44.30977631 44.30977631 963 963 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 021 -122.22649384 -122.22649384 44.30910110 44.30910110 871 871 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 022 -122.25454712 -122.25454712 44.31787872 44.31787872 1213 1213 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 023 -122.22696686 -122.22696686 44.28716660 44.28716660 896 896 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 024 -122.16931915 -122.16931915 44.29024506 44.29024506 853 853 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 025 -122.17044067 -122.17044067 44.28989792 44.28989792 822 822 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 026 -122.08719635 -122.08719635 44.31628036 44.31628036 1377 1377 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 027 -122.06960297 -122.06960297 44.30563354 44.30563354 1243 1243 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 028 -122.23383331 -122.23383331 44.04850006 44.04850006 1210 1210 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 029 -122.16917419 -122.16917419 44.25529480 44.25529480 859 859 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 030 -122.27058411 -122.27058411 44.22588730 44.22588730 579 579 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 031 -122.12772369 -122.12772369 44.26647186 44.26647186 1249 1249 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 032 -122.13211823 -122.13211823 44.28177643 44.28177643 1225 1225 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 033 -122.13366699 -122.13366699 44.28221512 44.28221512 1255 1255 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 034 -122.12468719 -122.12468719 44.24209976 44.24209976 1469 1469 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 035 -122.17703247 -122.17703247 44.23232651 44.23232651 682 682 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 036 -122.12672424 -122.12672424 44.26824570 44.26824570 1277 1277 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 037 -122.25498199 -122.25498199 44.31618118 44.31618118 1219 1219 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 038 -122.24430847 -122.24430847 44.32199860 44.32199860 1310 1310 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 039 -122.29086304 -122.29086304 44.23891830 44.23891830 744 744 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 040 -122.22016907 -122.22016907 44.08050156 44.08050156 682 682 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 041 -122.16930389 -122.16930389 44.30461121 44.30461121 841 841 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 042 -122.21219635 -122.21219635 44.18655396 44.18655396 457 457 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 043 -122.16500092 -122.16500092 44.21844482 44.21844482 786 786 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 044 -122.00000000 -122.00000000 44.00000000 44.00000000 883 883 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 045 -122.24411011 -122.24411011 44.04822159 44.04822159 938 938 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 046 -122.16625214 -122.16625214 44.22586060 44.22586060 701 701 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 047 -122.16491699 -122.16491699 44.25827789 44.25827789 865 865 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 048 -122.17510986 -122.17510986 44.25655365 44.25655365 835 835 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 049 -122.21739197 -122.21739197 44.06477737 44.06477737 609 609 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 050 -122.25061035 -122.25061035 44.28877640 44.28877640 1213 1213 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 051 -122.24913788 -122.24913788 44.29180527 44.29180527 1200 1200 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 052 -122.27633667 -122.27633667 44.29336166 44.29336166 1085 1085 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 053 -122.28033447 -122.28033447 44.30316544 44.30316544 1255 1255 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 054 -122.27861023 -122.27861023 44.29477692 44.29477692 1078 1078 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 055 -122.27716827 -122.27716827 44.30580521 44.30580521 1261 1261 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 056 -122.26911163 -122.26911163 44.31039047 44.31039047 1237 1237 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 057 -122.17036438 -122.17036438 44.29177856 44.29177856 835 835 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 058 -122.16278076 -122.16278076 44.29069519 44.29069519 938 938 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 059 -122.28861237 -122.28861237 44.21333313 44.21333313 771 771 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 060 -122.28816986 -122.28816986 44.20644379 44.20644379 914 914 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 061 -122.29550171 -122.29550171 44.26411057 44.26411057 1286 1286 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 062 -122.30552673 -122.30552673 44.26266479 44.26266479 1097 1097 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 063 -122.17641449 -122.17641449 44.23011017 44.23011017 731 731 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 064 -122.16696930 -122.16696930 44.22124863 44.22124863 737 737 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 065 -122.15399933 -122.15399933 44.27061081 44.27061081 1194 1194 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 066 -122.16505432 -122.16505432 44.30780411 44.30780411 914 914 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 067 -122.15758514 -122.15758514 44.30791855 44.30791855 999 999 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 068 -122.19486237 -122.19486237 44.27155685 44.27155685 609 609 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 069 -122.16649628 -122.16649628 44.30452728 44.30452728 853 853 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 070 -122.19210815 -122.19210815 44.24963760 44.24963760 755 755 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 071 -122.20786285 -122.20786285 44.27905655 44.27905655 701 701 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 072 -122.24375153 -122.24375153 44.39608383 44.39608383 615 615 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 073 -122.16725159 -122.16725159 44.38902664 44.38902664 981 981 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 074 -122.19525146 -122.19525146 44.39411163 44.39411163 1249 1249 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 075 -122.13358307 -122.13358307 44.34147263 44.34147263 1194 1194 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 076 -122.13919067 -122.13919067 44.35147095 44.35147095 1237 1237 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 077 -122.13053131 -122.13053131 44.32272339 44.32272339 1091 1091 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 078 -122.13280487 -122.13280487 44.33738708 44.33738708 1158 1158 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 079 -122.12816620 -122.12816620 44.34463882 44.34463882 1252 1252 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 080 -122.14657593 -122.14657593 44.34416962 44.34416962 1322 1322 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 081 -122.14638519 -122.14638519 44.34219360 44.34219360 1319 1319 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 082 -122.14897156 -122.14897156 44.34222412 44.34222412 1335 1335 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 083 -122.12966919 -122.12966919 44.35725021 44.35725021 1170 1170 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 084 -122.13214111 -122.13214111 44.35614014 44.35614014 1191 1191 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 085 -122.14819336 -122.14819336 44.33919525 44.33919525 1341 1341 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 086 -122.14294434 -122.14294434 44.33447266 44.33447266 1261 1261 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 087 -122.14983368 -122.14983368 44.27180481 44.27180481 1280 1280 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 088 -122.31583405 -122.31583405 44.36469269 44.36469269 1289 1289 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 089 -122.33797455 -122.33797455 44.37305450 44.37305450 1139 1139 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 090 -122.14111328 -122.14111328 44.33680725 44.33680725 1255 1255 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 091 -122.26058197 -122.26058197 44.30952835 44.30952835 1298 1298 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 092 -122.26789093 -122.26789093 44.31158447 44.31158447 1286 1286 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 093 -122.22213745 -122.22213745 44.27027893 44.27027893 798 798 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 094 -122.21321869 -122.21321869 44.32252884 44.32252884 1212 1212 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 095 -122.18711090 -122.18711090 44.25266647 44.25266647 734 734 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 096 -122.13030243 -122.13030243 44.32397079 44.32397079 1078 1078 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 097 -122.31105042 -122.31105042 44.21004868 44.21004868 957 957 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 098 -122.30457306 -122.30457306 44.20541000 44.20541000 950 950 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 099 -122.31181335 -122.31181335 44.20440292 44.20440292 970 970 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 100 -122.18194580 -122.18194580 44.31568146 44.31568146 914 914 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 101 -122.18441772 -122.18441772 44.28411102 44.28411102 853 853 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 102 -122.17942810 -122.17942810 44.28294754 44.28294754 796 796 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 103 -122.20143127 -122.20143127 44.27234268 44.27234268 731 731 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 104 -122.19536591 -122.19536591 44.25873947 44.25873947 837 837 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 105 -122.19882202 -122.19882202 44.25537872 44.25537872 813 813 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 106 -122.18605804 -122.18605804 44.25844574 44.25844574 811 811 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 107 -122.21198273 -122.21198273 44.25131226 44.25131226 675 675 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 108 -122.18433380 -122.18433380 44.27465820 44.27465820 670 670 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 109 -122.18566132 -122.18566132 44.27143478 44.27143478 790 790 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 110 -122.18328857 -122.18328857 44.27288437 44.27288437 796 796 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 111 -122.19947052 -122.19947052 44.23069382 44.23069382 610 610 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 112 -122.16085815 -122.16085815 44.22463989 44.22463989 823 823 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 113 -122.19180298 -122.19180298 44.26811218 44.26811218 732 732 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 114 -122.00000000 -122.00000000 44.00000000 44.00000000 604 604 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 115 -122.27925110 -122.27925110 44.19202805 44.19202805 683 683 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 116 -122.27927399 -122.27927399 44.23213959 44.23213959 762 762 meter Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 117 -122.34493256 -122.34493256 44.37403107 44.37403107 1127 1127 meter Sherri L. Johnson

US Forest Service ;Pacific NW Research Station ;3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis OR 97331 USA

541-758-7771 sherri.johnson2@usda.gov sherri.johnson@oregonstate.edu https://www.fs.fed.us/research/people/profile.php?alias=sherrijohnson Principal Investigator Julia A. Jones

Oregon State University;Department of Geosciences; Wilkinson Hall 104 Corvallis OR 97331-5506 USA

(541) 737-1224 Julia.Jones@oregonstate.edu geojulia@comcast.net http://ceoas.oregonstate.edu/profile/jones/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-8925 Principal Investigator Matthew G Betts

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201E Richardson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

(541) 737-3841 matt.betts@oregonstate.edu http://www.fsl.orst.edu/flel/index.htm Principal Investigator Michael P. Nelson

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-9221 mpnelson@oregonstate.edu http://www.michaelpnelson.com http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-4752 Principal Investigator David Bell david.bell@usda.gov david.bell@oregonstate.edu https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/about/david-bell Principal Investigator The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest is a living laboratory that provides unparalleled opportunities for the study of forest and stream ecosystems in the central Cascade Range of Oregon. Since 1980, as a part of the National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-LTER) program, the Andrews Experimental Forest has become a leader in the analysis of forest and stream ecosystem dynamics. Long-term field experiments and measurement programs have focused on climate dynamics, streamflow, water quality, and vegetation succession. Currently researchers are working to develop concepts and tools needed to predict effects of natural disturbance, land use, and climate change on ecosystem structure, function, and species composition. The Andrews Experimental Forest is administered cooperatively by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University and the Willamette National Forest. Funding for the research program comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and other sources. Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. National Science Foundation: DEB1440409 The Andrews Forest is situated in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, and covers the entire 15,800-acre (6400-ha) drainage basin of Lookout Creek. Elevation ranges from 1350 to 5340 feet (410 to 1630 m). Broadly representative of the rugged mountainous landscape of the Pacific Northwest, the Andrews Forest contains excellent examples of the region's conifer forests and associated wildlife and stream ecosystems. These forests are among the tallest and most productive in the world, with tree heights of often greater than 250 ft (75 m). Streams are steep, cold and clean, providing habitat for numerous aquatic organisms. 1 SA02101 Epiphytic Macrolichen Communities: SA02101.csv 180931 f4514f8e8370a15e18ac1805def0d4d6 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SA02101_v2.csv 1997-09-23 1999-09-15 DBCODE FSDB Database Code char(5) SA021 FSDB database code SA021 ENTITY Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1 natural 1.0000 1.0000 DATE Date of sampling datetime YYYY-MM-DD 9/23/1997 12:00:00 AM 9/15/1999 12:00:00 PM PLOT plot (stand) name; all beginning with SB followed by a number char(5) SB01 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 001 SB02 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 002 SB03 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 003 SB04 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 004 SB05 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 005 SB06 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 006 SB07 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 007 SB08 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 008 SB09 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 009 SB10 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 010 SB11 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 011 SB12 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 012 SB13 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 013 SB14 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 014 SB15 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 015 SB16 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 016 SB17 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 017 SB18 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 018 SB19 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 019 SB20 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 020 SB21 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 021 SB22 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 022 SB23 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 023 SB24 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 024 SB25 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 025 SB26 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 026 SB27 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 027 SB28 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 028 SB29 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 029 SB30 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 030 SB31 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 031 SB32 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 032 SB33 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 033 SB34 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 034 SB35 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 035 SB36 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 036 SB37 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 037 SB38 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 038 SB39 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 039 SB40 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 040 SB41 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 041 SB42 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 042 SB43 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 043 SB44 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 044 SB45 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 045 SB46 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 046 SB47 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 047 SB48 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 048 SB49 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 049 SB50 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 050 SB51 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 051 SB52 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 052 SB53 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 053 SB54 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 054 SB55 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 055 SB56 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 056 SB57 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 057 SB58 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 058 SB59 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 059 SB60 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 060 SB61 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 061 SB62 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 062 SB63 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 063 SB64 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 064 SB65 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 065 SB66 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 066 SB67 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 067 SB68 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 068 SB69 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 069 SB70 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 070 SB71 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 071 SB72 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 072 SB73 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 073 SB74 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 074 SB75 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 075 SB76 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 076 SB77 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 077 SB78 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 078 SB79 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 079 SB80 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 080 SB81 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 081 SB82 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 082 SB83 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 083 SB84 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 084 SB85 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 085 SB86 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 086 SB87 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 087 SB88 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 088 SB89 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 089 SB90 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 090 SB91 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 091 SB92 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 092 SB93 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 093 SB94 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 094 SB95 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 095 SB96 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 096 SB97 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 097 SB98 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 098 SB99 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 099 SB100 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 100 SB101 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 101 SB102 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 102 SB103 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 103 SB104 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 104 SB105 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 105 SB106 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 106 SB107 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 107 SB108 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 108 SB109 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 109 SB110 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 110 SB111 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 111 SB112 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 112 SB113 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 113 SB114 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 114 SB115 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 115 SB116 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 116 SB117 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 117 SPECIES Lichen scientific name varchar(35) Melanelia elegantula Melanelia elegantula Alectoria imshaugii Alectoria imshaugii Alectoria sarmentosa Alectoria sarmentosa Alectoria vancouverensis Alectoria vancouverensis Bryoria Bryoria Bryoria capillaris Bryoria capillaris Bryoria fremontii Bryoria fremontii Bryoria friabilis Bryoria friabilis Bryoria fuscescens Bryoria fuscescens Bryoria pseudofuscescens Bryoria pseudofuscescens Candelaria concolor Candelaria concolor Cavernularia hultenii Cavernularia hultenii Cetraria canadensis Cetraria canadensis Cetraria chlorophylla Cetraria chlorophylla Cetraria orbata Cetraria orbata Cetraria pallidula Cetraria pallidula Cetraria platyphylla Cetraria platyphylla Cladonia Cladonia Cladonia coniocraea Cladonia coniocraea Cladonia fimbriata Cladonia fimbriata Cladonia ochrochlora Cladonia ochrochlora Cladonia squamosa Cladonia squamosa Cladonia transcendens Cladonia transcendens Evernia prunastri Evernia prunastri Hypogymnia Hypogymnia Hypogymnia apinnata Hypogymnia apinnata Hypogymnia enteromorpha Hypogymnia enteromorpha Hypogymnia imshaugii Hypogymnia imshaugii Hypogymnia inactiva Hypogymnia inactiva Hypogymnia metaphysodes Hypogymnia metaphysodes Hypogymnia occidentalis Hypogymnia occidentalis Hypogymnia oceanica Hypogymnia oceanica Hypogymnia physodes Hypogymnia physodes Hypogymnia rugosa Hypogymnia rugosa Hypogymnia tubulosa Hypogymnia tubulosa Hypotrachyna sinuosa Hypotrachyna sinuosa Letharia columbiana Letharia columbiana Letharia vulpina Letharia vulpina Lobaria oregana Lobaria oregana Lobaria pulmonaria Lobaria pulmonaria Lobaria scrobiculata Lobaria scrobiculata Melanelia Melanelia Melanelia exasperatula Melanelia exasperatula Melanelia multispora Melanelia multispora Melanelia subaurifera Melanelia subaurifera Nephroma Nephroma Nephroma bellum Nephroma bellum Nephroma helveticum Nephroma helveticum Nephroma laevigatum Nephroma laevigatum Nephroma occultum Nephroma occultum Nephroma parile Nephroma parile Nephroma resupinatum Nephroma resupinatum Parmelia Parmelia Parmelia hygrophila Parmelia hygrophila Parmelia pseudosulcata Parmelia pseudosulcata Parmelia saxatilis Parmelia saxatilis Parmelia sulcata Parmelia sulcata Parmeliopsis ambigua Parmeliopsis ambigua Parmeliopsis hyperopta Parmeliopsis hyperopta Peltigera collina Peltigera collina Physcia adscendens Physcia adscendens Physcia aipolia Physcia aipolia Physcia tenella Physcia tenella Platismatia glauca Platismatia glauca Platismatia herrei Platismatia herrei Platismatia norvegica Platismatia norvegica Platismatia stenophylla Platismatia stenophylla Pseudocyphellaria Pseudocyphellaria Pseudocyphellaria anomala Pseudocyphellaria anomala Pseudocyphellaria anthraspis Pseudocyphellaria anthraspis Pseudocyphellaria crocata Pseudocyphellaria crocata Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis Ramalina farinacea Ramalina farinacea Sphaerophorus globosus Sphaerophorus globosus Sticta fuliginosa Sticta fuliginosa Sticta limbata Sticta limbata Sticta weigelii Sticta weigelii Usnea Usnea Usnea wirthii Usnea wirthii Xanthoria Xanthoria Xanthoria polycarpa Xanthoria polycarpa Bryoria glabra Bryoria glabra Bryoria tortuosa Bryoria tortuosa Bryoria trichodes Bryoria trichodes Cetraria merrillii Cetraria merrillii Cetraria subalpina Cetraria subalpina Cladonia albonigra Cladonia albonigra Cladonia carneola Cladonia carneola Cladonia norvegica Cladonia norvegica Cladonia squamosa var. subsquamosa Cladonia squamosa var. subsquamosa Cladonia umbricola Cladonia umbricola Leptogium cyanescens Leptogium cyanescens Leptogium polycarpum Leptogium polycarpum Melanelia fuliginosa Melanelia fuliginosa Nodobryoria abbreviata Nodobryoria abbreviata Nodobryoria oregana Nodobryoria oregana Peltigera britannica Peltigera britannica Ramalina dilacerata Ramalina dilacerata Usnea chaetophora Usnea chaetophora Usnea cornuta Usnea cornuta Usnea diplotypus Usnea diplotypus Usnea filipendula Usnea filipendula Usnea glabrata Usnea glabrata Usnea glabrescens Usnea glabrescens Usnea scabrata Usnea scabrata Usnea substerilis Usnea substerilis Esslingeriana idahoensis Esslingeriana idahoensis Pannaria leucostictoides Pannaria leucostictoides Vulpicida canadensis Vulpicida canadensis Bryoria mystery olive sp. Bryoria mystery olive sp. Pannaria saubinetii Pannaria saubinetii CODE FHM/FIA species codes from U.S. FIA lichen community program char(6) MELELE Melanelia elegantula ALEIMS Alectoria imshaugii ALESAR Alectoria sarmentosa ALEVAN Alectoria vancouverensis BRY Bryoria BRYCAP Bryoria capillaris BRYFRE Bryoria fremontii BRYFRI Bryoria friabilis BRYFUS Bryoria fuscescens BRYPSE Bryoria pseudofuscescens CNDCON Candelaria concolor CAVHUL Cavernularia hultenii CETCAN Cetraria canadensis CETCHL Cetraria chlorophylla CETORB Cetraria orbata CETPAL Cetraria pallidula CETPLA Cetraria platyphylla CLA Cladonia CLACON Cladonia coniocraea CLAFIM Cladonia fimbriata CLAOCH Cladonia ochrochlora CLASQU Cladonia squamosa CLATRA Cladonia transcendens EVEPRU Evernia prunastri HYP Hypogymnia HYPAPI Hypogymnia apinnata HYPENT Hypogymnia enteromorpha HYPIMS Hypogymnia imshaugii HYPINA Hypogymnia inactiva HYPMET Hypogymnia metaphysodes HYPOCC Hypogymnia occidentalis HYPOCE Hypogymnia oceanica HYPPHY Hypogymnia physodes HYPRUG Hypogymnia rugosa HYPTUB Hypogymnia tubulosa HTRSIN Hypotrachyna sinuosa LETCOL Letharia columbiana LETVUL Letharia vulpina LOBORE Lobaria oregana LOBPUL Lobaria pulmonaria LOBSCR Lobaria scrobiculata MEL Melanelia MELEXL Melanelia exasperatula MELMUL Melanelia multispora MELSUB Melanelia subaurifera NEP Nephroma NEPBEL Nephroma bellum NEPHEL Nephroma helveticum NEPLAE Nephroma laevigatum NEPOCC Nephroma occultum NEPPAR Nephroma parile NEPRES Nephroma resupinatum PAR Parmelia PARHYG Parmelia hygrophila PARPSE Parmelia pseudosulcata PARSAX Parmelia saxatilis PARSUL Parmelia sulcata POPAMB Parmeliopsis ambigua POPHYP Parmeliopsis hyperopta PELCOL Peltigera collina PHYADS Physcia adscendens PHYAIP Physcia aipolia PHYTEN Physcia tenella PLAGLA Platismatia glauca PLAHER Platismatia herrei PLANOR Platismatia norvegica PLASTE Platismatia stenophylla PCY Pseudocyphellaria PCYANO Pseudocyphellaria anomala PCYANT Pseudocyphellaria anthraspis PCYCRO Pseudocyphellaria crocata PCYRAI Pseudocyphellaria rainierensis RAMFAR Ramalina farinacea SPHGLO Sphaerophorus globosus STIFUL Sticta fuliginosa STILIM Sticta limbata STIWEI Sticta weigelii USN Usnea USNWIR Usnea wirthii XAN Xanthoria XANPOL Xanthoria polycarpa BRYGLA Bryoria glabra BRYTOR Bryoria tortuosa BRYTRI Bryoria trichodes CETMER Cetraria merrillii CETSUB Cetraria subalpina CLAALB Cladonia albonigra CLACAR Cladonia carneola CLANOR Cladonia norvegica CLASSQ Cladonia squamosa var. subsquamosa CLAUMB Cladonia umbricola LEPCYA Leptogium cyanescens LEPPOL Leptogium polycarpum MELFUL Melanelia fuliginosa NODABB Nodobryoria abbreviata NODORE Nodobryoria oregana PELBRI Peltigera britannica RAMDIL Ramalina dilacerata USNCHA Usnea chaetophora USNCOR Usnea cornuta USNDIP Usnea diplotypus USNFIL Usnea filipendula USNGLA Usnea glabrata USNGLS Usnea glabrescens USNSCA Usnea scabrata USNSST Usnea substerilis ESSIDA Esslingeriana idahoensis PANLED Pannaria leucostictoides VULCAN Vulpicida canadensis BRYOLI Bryoria mystery olive sp. PANSAU Pannaria saubinetii ABUNDANCE abundance code char(1) 1 rare (<3 individuals per plot) modified from FIA lichen program and Dr. Linda Geiser’s Air Quality Biomonitoring Program in the PNW 2 uncommon (4-10 individuals per plot) modified from FIA lichen program and Dr. Linda Geiser’s Air Quality Biomonitoring Program in the PNW 3 common (>10, but <40 individuals per plot) modified from FIA lichen program and Dr. Linda Geiser’s Air Quality Biomonitoring Program in the PNW 4 very common (>40 individuals per plot, but less than half of the available substrate was covered by the species) modified from FIA lichen program and Dr. Linda Geiser’s Air Quality Biomonitoring Program in the PNW 5 abundant (more than half of the available substrate had the species present) modified from FIA lichen program and Dr. Linda Geiser’s Air Quality Biomonitoring Program in the PNW PRIMARY SA02101.CODE SA02101.PLOT SA02101.SPECIES NOTNULL SA02101.ABUNDANCE SA02101.CODE SA02101.DATE SA02101.DBCODE SA02101.ENTITY SA02101.PLOT SA02101.SPECIES 0 2 SA02102 Epiphytic Macrolichen Biomass: SA02102.csv 5742 a03a68cd281ebc4fa0d5c05e573ac102 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SA02102_v2.csv 1997-09-23 1999-09-15 DBCODE FSDB Database Code char(5) SA021 FSDB database code SA021 ENTITY Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1 natural 2.0000 2.0000 PLOT plot (stand) name; all beginning with SB followed by a number char(5) SB01 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 001 SB02 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 002 SB03 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 003 SB04 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 004 SB05 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 005 SB06 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 006 SB07 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 007 SB08 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 008 SB09 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 009 SB10 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 010 SB11 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 011 SB12 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 012 SB13 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 013 SB14 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 014 SB15 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 015 SB16 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 016 SB17 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 017 SB18 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 018 SB19 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 019 SB20 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 020 SB21 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 021 SB22 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 022 SB23 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 023 SB24 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 024 SB25 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 025 SB26 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 026 SB27 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 027 SB28 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 028 SB29 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 029 SB30 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 030 SB31 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 031 SB32 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 032 SB33 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 033 SB34 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 034 SB35 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 035 SB36 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 036 SB37 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 037 SB38 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 038 SB39 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 039 SB40 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 040 SB41 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 041 SB42 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 042 SB43 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 043 SB44 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 044 SB45 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 045 SB46 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 046 SB47 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 047 SB48 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 048 SB49 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 049 SB50 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 050 SB51 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 051 SB52 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 052 SB53 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 053 SB54 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 054 SB55 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 055 SB56 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 056 SB57 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 057 SB58 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 058 SB59 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 059 SB60 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 060 SB61 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 061 SB62 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 062 SB63 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 063 SB64 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 064 SB65 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 065 SB66 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 066 SB67 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 067 SB68 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 068 SB69 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 069 SB70 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 070 SB71 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 071 SB72 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 072 SB73 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 073 SB74 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 074 SB75 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 075 SB76 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 076 SB77 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 077 SB78 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 078 SB79 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 079 SB80 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 080 SB81 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 081 SB82 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 082 SB83 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 083 SB84 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 084 SB85 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 085 SB86 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 086 SB87 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 087 SB88 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 088 SB89 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 089 SB90 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 090 SB91 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 091 SB92 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 092 SB93 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 093 SB94 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 094 SB95 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 095 SB96 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 096 SB97 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 097 SB98 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 098 SB99 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 099 SB100 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 100 SB101 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 101 SB102 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 102 SB103 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 103 SB104 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 104 SB105 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 105 SB106 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 106 SB107 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 107 SB108 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 108 SB109 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 109 SB110 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 110 SB111 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 111 SB112 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 112 SB113 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 113 SB114 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 114 SB115 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 115 SB116 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 116 SB117 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 117 CYANOAV average epiphytic cyanolichen biomass; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 3055.7800 FORAGEAV average epiphytic forage lichen biomass for a stand; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 26862.0000 MATRISAV average epiphytic matrix lichen biomass; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 2911.0000 CYANOSD standard deviation of the average epiphytic cyanolichen biomass; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 3430.0901 FORAGESD standard deviation of the average epiphytic forage lichen biomass for a stand; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 16962.0000 MATRIXSD standard deviation of the average epiphytic matrix lichen biomass for a stand; oven-dried numeric(7,2) kilograms per hectare 1 real 0.0000 2812.0400 PRIMARY SA02102.PLOT NOTNULL SA02102.CYANOAV SA02102.CYANOSD SA02102.DBCODE SA02102.ENTITY SA02102.FORAGEAV SA02102.FORAGESD SA02102.MATRISAV SA02102.MATRIXSD SA02102.PLOT 0 3 SA02103 Environmental Data: SA02103.csv 8423 1970a6eb3750b1310fb570225513a30e 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SA02103_v2.csv 1997-09-23 1999-09-15 DBCODE FSDB Database Code char(5) SA021 FSDB database code SA021 ENTITY Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1 natural 3.0000 3.0000 DATE Date of sampling datetime YYYY-MM-DD 9/23/1997 12:00:00 AM 9/15/1999 12:00:00 PM PLOT plot (stand) name; all beginning with SB followed by a number char(5) SB01 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 001 SB02 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 002 SB03 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 003 SB04 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 004 SB05 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 005 SB06 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 006 SB07 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 007 SB08 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 008 SB09 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 009 SB10 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 010 SB11 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 011 SB12 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 012 SB13 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 013 SB14 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 014 SB15 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 015 SB16 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 016 SB17 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 017 SB18 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 018 SB19 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 019 SB20 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 020 SB21 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 021 SB22 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 022 SB23 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 023 SB24 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 024 SB25 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 025 SB26 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 026 SB27 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 027 SB28 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 028 SB29 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 029 SB30 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 030 SB31 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 031 SB32 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 032 SB33 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 033 SB34 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 034 SB35 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 035 SB36 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 036 SB37 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 037 SB38 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 038 SB39 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 039 SB40 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 040 SB41 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 041 SB42 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 042 SB43 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 043 SB44 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 044 SB45 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 045 SB46 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 046 SB47 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 047 SB48 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 048 SB49 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 049 SB50 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 050 SB51 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 051 SB52 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 052 SB53 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 053 SB54 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 054 SB55 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 055 SB56 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 056 SB57 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 057 SB58 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 058 SB59 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 059 SB60 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 060 SB61 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 061 SB62 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 062 SB63 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 063 SB64 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 064 SB65 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 065 SB66 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 066 SB67 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 067 SB68 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 068 SB69 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 069 SB70 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 070 SB71 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 071 SB72 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 072 SB73 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 073 SB74 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 074 SB75 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 075 SB76 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 076 SB77 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 077 SB78 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 078 SB79 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 079 SB80 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 080 SB81 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 081 SB82 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 082 SB83 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 083 SB84 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 084 SB85 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 085 SB86 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 086 SB87 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 087 SB88 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 088 SB89 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 089 SB90 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 090 SB91 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 091 SB92 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 092 SB93 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 093 SB94 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 094 SB95 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 095 SB96 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 096 SB97 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 097 SB98 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 098 SB99 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 099 SB100 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 100 SB101 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 101 SB102 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 102 SB103 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 103 SB104 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 104 SB105 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 105 SB106 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 106 SB107 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 107 SB108 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 108 SB109 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 109 SB110 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 110 SB111 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 111 SB112 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 112 SB113 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 113 SB114 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 114 SB115 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 115 SB116 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 116 SB117 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 117 BAF Basal Area Factor for the entire plot (used for all subplots) numeric(2,0) number 1 natural 0.0000 50.0000 PLTSERIE vascular plant series char(1) 1 western hemlock vascular plant series Logan, S.A., Hemstrom, M.A. & Paulat, W. 1987. Plant association and management guide: Willamette National Forest. USDA Forest Service, R6-ECOL-TP. Portland, OR, US. 2 true fir vascular plant series Logan, S.A., Hemstrom, M.A. & Paulat, W. 1987. Plant association and management guide: Willamette National Forest. USDA Forest Service, R6-ECOL-TP. Portland, OR, US. AGECLASS stand age classes of the younger cohort or codominant overstory char(1) 1 young, < 20 yrs 2 pole, 21-80 yrs 3 mature, 81-200 yrs 4 old growth (> 200 yrs) REMCLASS retention classes for the percent of remnants in the older cohort (historical retention based on the percent canopy cover of live remnant trees that survived the most recent disturbance) char(1) 1 0% (0 to 7.5%) 2 15% (7.5 to 22.5%) 3 30% (22.5 to 37.0%) 4 50% (37.0 to 62%) 5 old growth (not stratified by remnant class) LAT latitude numeric(8,5) decimal degrees latitude or longitude 1 real 44.0000 44.4000 LONG longitude numeric(9,5) decimal degrees latitude or longitude 1 real -122.3500 -122.0000 TOPOCLA topographic classes (upland or riparian areas) char(1) 1 upland site that does not include or overlap with riparian areas (topocla1) 2 riparian site with perennial fish bearing streams < 5th order (topocla2) 3 riparian sites with perennial non fish-bearing streams (topocla3) 4 riparian sites with intermittent streams (topocla4) TOPOPOS classes for the topographic position of the stand in relation to the surrounding landscape char(1) 1 flat or rounded ridge top or peak > 120' wide 2 narrow ridge top or peak (120' wide) 3 side hill, upper 1/3 4 side hill, middle 1/3 5 side hill, lower 1/3 6 canyon bottom < 660' or more wide 7 bench or terrace 8 broad flat 660' or more wide 9 other, describe ELEV elevation is altitude measured in meters above sea level, recorded from the GPS unit numeric(4,0) meters 1 whole 457.0000 1659.0000 SLOPE the % slope at plot center, measured with a clinometer numeric(3,0) percent 1 whole 0.0000 100.0000 ASPECT aspect is the direction in which the water flows down hill; degrees east of true north, measured with a compass numeric(3,0) degrees azimuth 1 whole 0.0000 360.0000 BIOIND categorical variable indicating if epiphytic macrolichen biomass was sampled in a stand char(1) 0 no biomass sampled 1 biomass was sampled PRIMARY SA02103.PLOT NOTNULL SA02103.AGECLASS SA02103.ASPECT SA02103.BIOIND SA02103.DATE SA02103.DBCODE SA02103.ELEV SA02103.ENTITY SA02103.LAT SA02103.LONG SA02103.PLOT SA02103.PLTSERIE SA02103.REMCLASS SA02103.SLOPE SA02103.TOPOCLA SA02103.TOPOPOS 0 4 SA02104 Derived Environmental Data: SA02104.csv 7512 01d687e90471512c1a8b18298c90d9e4 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SA02104_v2.csv 1997-09-23 1999-09-15 DBCODE FSDB Database Code char(5) SA021 FSDB database code SA021 ENTITY Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1 natural 4.0000 4.0000 PLOT plot (stand) name; all beginning with SB followed by a number char(5) SB01 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 001 SB02 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 002 SB03 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 003 SB04 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 004 SB05 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 005 SB06 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 006 SB07 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 007 SB08 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 008 SB09 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 009 SB10 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 010 SB11 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 011 SB12 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 012 SB13 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 013 SB14 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 014 SB15 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 015 SB16 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 016 SB17 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 017 SB18 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 018 SB19 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 019 SB20 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 020 SB21 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 021 SB22 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 022 SB23 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 023 SB24 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 024 SB25 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 025 SB26 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 026 SB27 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 027 SB28 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 028 SB29 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 029 SB30 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 030 SB31 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 031 SB32 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 032 SB33 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 033 SB34 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 034 SB35 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 035 SB36 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 036 SB37 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 037 SB38 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 038 SB39 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 039 SB40 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 040 SB41 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 041 SB42 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 042 SB43 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 043 SB44 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 044 SB45 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 045 SB46 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 046 SB47 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 047 SB48 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 048 SB49 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 049 SB50 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 050 SB51 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 051 SB52 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 052 SB53 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 053 SB54 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 054 SB55 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 055 SB56 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 056 SB57 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 057 SB58 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 058 SB59 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 059 SB60 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 060 SB61 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 061 SB62 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 062 SB63 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 063 SB64 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 064 SB65 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 065 SB66 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 066 SB67 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 067 SB68 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 068 SB69 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 069 SB70 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 070 SB71 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 071 SB72 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 072 SB73 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 073 SB74 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 074 SB75 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 075 SB76 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 076 SB77 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 077 SB78 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 078 SB79 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 079 SB80 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 080 SB81 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 081 SB82 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 082 SB83 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 083 SB84 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 084 SB85 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 085 SB86 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 086 SB87 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 087 SB88 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 088 SB89 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 089 SB90 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 090 SB91 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 091 SB92 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 092 SB93 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 093 SB94 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 094 SB95 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 095 SB96 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 096 SB97 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 097 SB98 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 098 SB99 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 099 SB100 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 100 SB101 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 101 SB102 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 102 SB103 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 103 SB104 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 104 SB105 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 105 SB106 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 106 SB107 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 107 SB108 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 108 SB109 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 109 SB110 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 110 SB111 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 111 SB112 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 112 SB113 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 113 SB114 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 114 SB115 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 115 SB116 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 116 SB117 Shanti Berryman Lichen Plot 117 PDIR potential direct incident radiation; represents the amount of light a site potentially receives, derived from latitude, slope, and aspect (McCune and Keon 2002) numeric(4,2) megaJoule per cm2 per year 1 real 0.2800 1.0500 HL heat load index measures the amount of heat a site potentially receives during the day, derived from models based on latitude, slope, and aspect numeric(4,2) number 1 real 0.2600 1.0400 LIVEBA basal area of live trees, averaged over five variable -radius subplots; measured using a relescope in 1997 and an angle gauge in 1998 and 1999 numeric(6,2) square meters per hectare 1 real 2.7600 123.0700 DEADBA basal area of dead trees, averaged over five variable-radius subplots; measured using a relescope in 1997 and an angle gauge in 1998 and 1999 numeric(5,2) square meters per hectare 1 real 0.0000 34.9000 TOTBA total basal area of live and dead trees, averaged over five variable-radius subplots; measured using a relescope in 1997 and an angle gauge in 1998 and 1999 numeric(6,2) square meters per hectare 1 real 2.7600 128.5800 REMBA basal area of live remnant trees, averaged over five variable-radius subplots; measured using a relescope in 1997 and an angle gauge in 1998 and 1999 numeric(5,2) square meters per hectare 1 real 0.0000 66.1200 BACONIF percent basal area of conifers in a stand (percentage of total basal area) numeric(6,2) percent 1 real 47.4000 100.0000 BAHARDW percent basal area of hardwood trees in a stand (percentage of total basal area) numeric(5,2) percent 1 real 0.0000 52.6000 PERBAREM percent basal area of live remnant trees in a stand (percentage of total basal area) numeric(5,2) percent 1 real 0.0000 96.3000 PRIMARY SA02104.PLOT NOTNULL SA02104.BACONIF SA02104.BAHARDW SA02104.DBCODE SA02104.DEADBA SA02104.ENTITY SA02104.HL SA02104.LIVEBA SA02104.PDIR SA02104.PERBAREM SA02104.PLOT SA02104.REMBA SA02104.TOTBA 0 kilograms per hectare degrees azimuth (0-360) meter; SI unit of length decimal degrees; latitude (parallel) or longitude (meridian) megaJoule per square centimeter per year percent; a number square meters per hectare inches; an imperial measure of length dimensionless number, i.e., ratio, count