uid=AND,o=lter,dc=ecoinformatics,dc=org all public read SP002 Alfred B. Levno

Corvallis OR 97331 USA

ablevno@comcast.net allevno@hotmail.com Jack S. Rothacher Paul W. Adams Other Researcher Alan L. Flint Other Researcher Richard L. Fredriksen Former Investigator Donald L. Henshaw

Pacific Northwest Research Station; Corvallis Forestry Sciences Lab; 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis Oregon 97331

hja_admin@fsl.orst.edu http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-4528 Abstractor Alfred B. Levno

Corvallis OR 97331 USA

ablevno@comcast.net allevno@hotmail.com Principal Investigator Alfred B. Levno

Corvallis OR 97331 USA

ablevno@comcast.net allevno@hotmail.com Creator Jack S. Rothacher Creator 2013-12-16 This soil moisture study was initiated in 1960 to investigate the effects of patch clearcut logging and slash burning (1962-63) in an old-growth Douglas-fir forest in the Oregon Cascade Range. Since soil moisture and vegetation sampling continued regularly until 1980, this is a unique data set that represents nearly two decades of post-treatment information. Plant cover exerts a profound influence on soil moisture levels through its effects on interception, infiltration, evaporation, and transpiration. In the Douglas-fir forests of the Pacific Northwest, clearcut logging and slash burning are common practices that can dramatically alter plant cover and soil moisture. Logging can increase soil moisture by temporarily reducing cover and associated water use, and burning may further augment soil moisture levels by suppressing the survival and regrowth of vegetation. Indeed, part of the rationale for slash burning in the region is to control shrubs and other vegetation that would otherwise compete with conifer seedlings for available moisture, light, and nutrients. Within a few years after burning, however, invading vegetation may deplete soil moisture to levels comparable to forested areas. Such observations point to the value of long-term information to better understand dynamic soil moisture and plant cover responses to forest practices. interception water content trophic structure soil moisture water balance analytical tools neutron probe disturbance evapotranspiration clearcutting inorganic nutrients vegetation LTER controlled vocabulary Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) gavimetric sampling moisture stress Andrews Experimental Forest site thesaurus disturbance inorganic nutrients LTER core research areas Jack Rothacher established and supervised the soil moisture study from 1960-63. R. L. Fredriksen supervised the soil moisture study from 1964-1983. Al Levno established and supervised the vegetation survey from 1964-1983. Don Henshaw provided data management assistance.Related PublicationsAdams, Paul W.; Flint, Alan L.; Fredriksen, Richard L. 1991. Long-term patterns in soil moisture and revegetation after clearcut of a Douglas-fir forest in Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management. 41: 249-263.Adams, Paul W.; Flint, Alan L. 1986. Soil moisture patterns following clearcut harvest of a Douglas-fir forest. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University; project completion report to supplement number PNW-85-382. 18 p. Data Use Agreement: The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. This Data Set is released under the Creative Commons license CC BY "Attribution" (see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Creative Commons license CC BY - Attribution is a license that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work (even commercially), as long as you are credited for the original creation. This license accommodates maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. It is considered professional conduct and an ethical obligation to acknowledge the work of other scientists. The Data User is asked to provide attribution of the original work if this data package is shared in whole or by individual parts or used in the derivation of other products. A recommended citation is provided for each Data Set in the Andrews LTER data catalog (see: http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/catalog/datacatalog.aspx). A generic citation is also provided for this Data Set on the website https://portal.edirepository.org in the summary metadata page. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed and all data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. General acknowledgement: Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/abstract.aspx?dbcode=SP002 Willamette National Forest; Andrews Experimental Forest, WS 3, unit 9C (L141) -122.24090134 -122.23625296 44.21890888 44.21588476 523 610 meter 1960-04-18 1983-11-21 All Organisms All Organisms Highest common category (ca. kingdom) Plantae Division or Phylum Polypodiophyta Class Filicopsida Order Polypodiales Family Dryopteridaceae Genus Polystichum Species Polystichum munitum Division or Phylum Magnoliophyta Class Magnoliopsida Subclass Hamamelididae Order Fagales Family Fagaceae Genus Chrysolepis Species Castanopsis chrysophylla Subclass Dilleniidae Order Ericales Family Ericaceae Genus Vaccinium Species Vaccinium parvifolium Genus Gaultheria Species Gaultheria shallon Genus Rhododendron Species Rhododendron macrophyllum Order Theales Family Clusiaceae Genus Hypericum Species Hypericum perforatum Subclass Magnoliidae Order Papaverales Family Fumariaceae Genus Dicentra Species Dicentra formosa Order Ranunculales Family Ranunculaceae Genus Coptis Species Coptis laciniata Genus Anemone Species Anemone deltoidea Family Berberidaceae Genus Berberis Species Berberis nervosa Subclass Rosidae Order Rosales Family Grossulariaceae Genus Ribes Species Ribes sanguineum Family Rosaceae Genus Holodiscus Species Holodiscus discolor Genus Rubus Species Rubus parviflorus Species Rubus leucodermis Species Rubus ursinus Family Hydrangeaceae Genus Whipplea Species Whipplea modesta Order Rhamnales Family Rhamnaceae Genus Rhamnus Species Rhamnus purshiana Genus Ceanothus Species Ceanothus sanguineus Species Ceanothus velutinus Order Sapindales Family Aceraceae Genus Acer Species Acer circinatum Order Cornales Family Cornaceae Genus Cornus Species Cornus nuttallii Species Cornus canadensis Order Myrtales Family Onagraceae Genus Epilobium Species Epilobium watsonii Species Epilobium minutum Species Epilobium paniculatum Species Epilobium angustifolium Order Fabales Family Fabaceae Genus Lotus Species Lotus micranthus Genus Trifolium Species Trifolium latifolium Class Liliopsida Subclass Liliidae Order Liliales Family Liliaceae Genus Trillium Species Trillium ovatum Order Orchidales Family Orchidaceae Genus Listera Species Listera borealis Subclass Asteridae Order Dipsacales Family Caprifoliaceae Genus Sambucus Order Gentianales Family Gentianaceae Genus Frasera Species Frasera speciosa Order Asterales Family Asteraceae Genus Gnaphalium Species Gnaphalium microcephalum Genus Cirsium Species Cirsium brevifolium Species Cirsium arvense Species Cirsium vulgare Genus Anaphalis Species Anaphalis margaritacea Genus Cotula Species Cotula coronopifolia Genus Hieracium Species Hieracium albiflorum Genus Madia Species Madia madioides Genus Senecio Species Senecio sylvaticus Order Rubiales Family Rubiaceae Genus Galium Species Galium triflorum Subclass Commelinidae Order Juncales Family Juncaceae Genus Luzula Species Luzula comosa Order Cyperales Family Poaceae Genus Festuca Species Festuca occidentalis Division or Phylum Coniferophyta Class Pinopsida Order Taxales Family Taxaceae Genus Taxus Species Taxus brevifolia Order Pinales Family Pinaceae Genus Pseudotsuga Species Pseudotsuga menziesii Genus Tsuga Species Tsuga heterophylla To study the relationship between vegetation cover and soil moisture during the re-establishment of vegetation after logging and burning of a Douglas-fir forest; to study the relationship between vegetation cover and soil water deficit and use, the change in soil moisture storage by depth over time, and the precipitation interception changes over various successional changes during re-establishment; also, to examine soil temperature by depth over time.

An update history is logged and maintained with each new version of every dataset.

notPlanned Original metadata creation. Version1 1984-11-14 Alan Flint and Paul Adams thoroughly reviewed the raw soil moisture data in Summer 1986 and compiled the summary available in Entity 1. Alan worked with Don Henshaw to build the first complete and quality assured version of all entities. Version2 1986-10-23 Metadata restructured and moved into SQLServer metadata database LTERMETA. Data moved into SQLServer database FSDBDATA. Version3 2002-05-29 Updated dates for formats 1-3 to truetype; created enum for STCODE; Added species code to attribute_taxonomic_classif for format 4; reran createcsv to create new delimiter for uploading into PASTA. Version7 2013-12-16 Information Manager

Andrews Forest LTER Program US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis OR 97331

hjaweb@fsl.orst.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Donald L. Henshaw

Pacific Northwest Research Station; Corvallis Forestry Sciences Lab; 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis Oregon 97331

hja_admin@fsl.orst.edu http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-4528 Andrews Forest LTER Site

Forest Ecosystems and Society Department in Forestry Oregon State University 201K Richardson Hall Corvallis OR 97331-5752

(541) 737-8480 lterweb@fsl.orst.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Field Methods - SP002 In 1960, soil pits were dug andnd a soil moisture stack was installed at a random location near each sample point. Each stack consisted of laboratory-calibrated fiberglas resistance blocks and thermisters at three depths of 6, 18, and 36 in. (30, 60, 120 cm) to monitor soil moisture (in resistance units) and soil temperature. Resistance measurements were taken about every three weeks from mid-spring to mid-autumn in 1960-63, along with bulk soil samples for gravimetric analysis and field calibration of the resistance units. [Three gravimetric samples were taken using the King tube at random locations in the plot. Samples were collected at 0-6, 6-18, and 18-36 in. depths and placed in cans. The gravimetric samples were used to calibrate the Coleman fiberglas soil moisture units.] Due to a constantly shifting calibration, however, the resistance units were abandoned in 1963 in favor of gravimetric samples (1964-65). Conjecture is that fine clays infiltrate the fiberglas units yielding higher soil moisture readings. The gravimetric samples were oven-dried to determine soil moisture content. Bulk density of soil at the measurement depths was determined on installation of fiberglas units. Soil bulk density and soil moisture are used to determine inches of soil water. A neutron probe (Troxler probe and scale) was acquired for more accurate and direct soil moisture measurement and neutron probe measurements (1966, 1967, 1969, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1980, 1983) were taken over a similar seasonal schedule (from April until November). Neutron measurements were taken with a calibrated probe at three randomly located access tubes around each sample point, with gravimetric samples also taken periodically to verify probe results. A new neutron probe was acquired for 1983 measurements. April measurements have been used to measure soil field capacity. All soil moisture data were converted to percent by volume and cm of moisture values using local soil bulk densities and coarse-fragment contents. Field capacity moisture contents were measured using soil cores collected 3-10 days following rain in winter. Plant-available moisture content was calculated as the field capacity moisture content minus the moisture content at -15 atm, using the pressure membrane method (Richards 1965). Available moisture capacity has since been more carefully defined to consider plant uptake of moisture at potentials lower than -15 atm (Flint and Childs 1984). Moisture at these lower potentials may only represent 2-4 percent water by volume (Flint 1983), however, so the data are still considered representative of nearly all of the available moisture in these soils. Vegetation type and cover was measured on four, 4.0 square meter plots (6.7 ft squares (milacre)) orthogonally located within the circular plot around each sample point on the transect in the treatment area. Herbs, bare ground, and litter are assessed on macro plots occupying one quadrant (1/4 milacre). This macro plot is divided into nine systematically located 0.1 sq. m micro plots and used to measure herb and low shrub (less than 60 cm tall) cover, whereas the entire 4.0 m(square) plot was used for measurements of trees and vegetation >60 cm tall. Vegetation surveys were conducted in late July or early August starting in 1964, and subsequently in the same years as the soil moisture measurements. Data for individual species were stratified into herb and low shrub or tree and tall shrub cover consistent with Dyrness (1973). Data from different transects used by Dyrness (1965) provide estimates of plant cover in 1963. One interception gage is located in each plot. Each gage is rotated around plot circumference at the four cardinal direction points. Gages are rotated at each collection time. A precipitation gage (no vegetation obstructions) is located on Plot 11 and serves as the standard for all soil moisture plots. Permanent Plots - SP002 6 .016 acre plots in the leave strip area of old-growth, and 5 (originally 6) .016 acre plots in the adjacent clearcut The study area is located within a 101 ha watershed (WS3) in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, 60 km east of Eugene, Oregon (Lat. 44 degrees 13 minutes N, Long. 122 degrees 15 minutes W). The watershed extends from 500 to 1070 m in elevation, with slopes averaging about 53 percent (Fredriksen 1970). Soils in the watershed have developed from the local andesitic breccia bedrock found at 1-4 meters, and are predominantly classified as loamy, skeletal Typic Dystrochrepts. Some baseline physical properties of the soil are given in Table 1. Weather data collected since 1952 on an adjacent watershed show a mild, humid, temperate climate with an average annual temperature of 9.4 degrees Centigrade, and an average annual precipitation level of about 225 cm. Precipitation normally occurs as rain, which is concentrated between October and May. Summers are typically cool (ave. July temp. = 20.6 degrees C) and dry (Rothacher 1965). Old-growth (300-500 yr) Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) dominates the undisturbed forest on the watershed, accompanied by numerous western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) of various ages. Local site productivity for Douglas-fir is moderate (43 m height at 100 yr), and when the study began (1960), the basal area of the Douglas-fir-Hemlock stand was about 90 m(square)/ha. Major prelogging understory communities on the watershed were rhododendron-salal (Rhododendron macrophyllum-Gaultheria shallon), vine maple-salal (Acer circinatum-Gaultheria shallon), vine maple-Oregon grape (Acer circinatum-Berberis nervosa), cutleaf goldthread (Coptis laciniata), and swordfern (Polystichum munitum) (Dyrness 1973). In the winter of 1962-63, 25 percent of the watershed was clearcut logged with a high-lead cable system in three patches of 5, 9, and 11 ha. The logged patches were broadcast burned in September of 1963, followed soon by planting of Douglas-fir seedlings. Log yarding resulted in largely minor and shallow soil disturbance in the cutover areas (Dyrness 1965), and moist conditions during burning produced only light, discontinuous charring of the surface litter (Fredriksen 1970). Sampling frequency: 1-3 weeks In 1960, two random, parallel transects, each about 125 m long, were laid out up and down a 30 percent, SW-facing slope on the watershed. One of the transects was located well within one of the patches (9 ha) that was clearcut in 1962-63, while the other was in undisturbed forest for the entire study. Six equal segments (approx. 25 m each) are established in two strips parallel to the cutting boundary, one strip on either side. Soil moisture stacks were placed at random within each segment, and the stack becomes the center of a 0.16-ac circular plot (6 plots in old-growth, 6 in cutting area, but one plot (plot 7) was lost to road construction in the cutting area). Soil moisture, vegetation cover, and throughfall are measured on each plot. The plots were installed in HJA WS 3 in October 1959. The cutting area was clearcut in winter 1962-1963, completed in February 1963, and broadcast burned in September 1963. NOTE: Plots 1-6 are in the forest; plots 8-12 are in the clearcut; plot 7 in clearcut was lost to road construction. Citation: Adams, Paul W.; Flint, Alan L. 1986. Soil moisture patterns following clearcut harvest of a Douglas-fir forest. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University; project completion report to supplement number PNW-85-382. 18 p. Andrews Watershed 3 -122.24194900 -122.22402200 44.21994300 44.20803100 1080 1080 meter UNIT L141 -122.24090134 -122.23625296 44.21890888 44.21588476 610 610 meter Sherri L. Johnson

US Forest Service ;Pacific NW Research Station ;3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis OR 97331 USA

541-758-7771 sherri.johnson2@usda.gov sherri.johnson@oregonstate.edu https://www.fs.fed.us/research/people/profile.php?alias=sherrijohnson Principal Investigator Julia A. Jones

Oregon State University;Department of Geosciences; Wilkinson Hall 104 Corvallis OR 97331-5506 USA

(541) 737-1224 Julia.Jones@oregonstate.edu geojulia@comcast.net http://ceoas.oregonstate.edu/profile/jones/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9429-8925 Principal Investigator Matthew G Betts

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201E Richardson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

(541) 737-3841 matt.betts@oregonstate.edu http://www.fsl.orst.edu/flel/index.htm Principal Investigator Michael P. Nelson

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-9221 mpnelson@oregonstate.edu http://www.michaelpnelson.com http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-4752 Principal Investigator David Bell david.bell@usda.gov david.bell@oregonstate.edu https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/about/david-bell Principal Investigator The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest is a living laboratory that provides unparalleled opportunities for the study of forest and stream ecosystems in the central Cascade Range of Oregon. Since 1980, as a part of the National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-LTER) program, the Andrews Experimental Forest has become a leader in the analysis of forest and stream ecosystem dynamics. Long-term field experiments and measurement programs have focused on climate dynamics, streamflow, water quality, and vegetation succession. Currently researchers are working to develop concepts and tools needed to predict effects of natural disturbance, land use, and climate change on ecosystem structure, function, and species composition. The Andrews Experimental Forest is administered cooperatively by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University and the Willamette National Forest. Funding for the research program comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and other sources. Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. National Science Foundation: DEB1440409 The Andrews Forest is situated in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, and covers the entire 15,800-acre (6400-ha) drainage basin of Lookout Creek. Elevation ranges from 1350 to 5340 feet (410 to 1630 m). Broadly representative of the rugged mountainous landscape of the Pacific Northwest, the Andrews Forest contains excellent examples of the region's conifer forests and associated wildlife and stream ecosystems. These forests are among the tallest and most productive in the world, with tree heights of often greater than 250 ft (75 m). Streams are steep, cold and clean, providing habitat for numerous aquatic organisms. 1 SP00201 Soil moisture content, 1960 - 1983: SP00201.csv 42779 8e1baa8c0732d00a4d5d535adbef53c8 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00201_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 1.0000 1.0000 SITECODE Site code char(4) WS03 Andrews watershed 3: clearcut L141, forest NW of L141 DATE Date of measurement datetime YYYY-MM-DD 1.000000 4/18/1960 12:00:00 AM 11/22/1983 12:00:00 AM DEPTH Soil depth numeric(3,1) feet 0.100000 real 0.5000 3.0000 PLOT1 Moisture content of soil at plot 1 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 9.6000 63.7000 PLOT2 Moisture content of soil at plot 2 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 9.4000 66.7000 PLOT3 Moisture content of soil at plot 3 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 7.7000 61.7000 PLOT4 Moisture content of soil at plot 4 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 8.6000 62.4000 PLOT5 Moisture content of soil at plot 5 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 9.9000 50.8000 PLOT6 Moisture content of soil at plot 6 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 6.9000 48.6000 PLOT8 Moisture content of soil at plot 8 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 6.9000 57.4000 PLOT9 Moisture content of soil at plot 9 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 7.8000 66.7000 PLOT10 Moisture content of soil at plot 10 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 8.6000 61.7000 PLOT11 Moisture content of soil at plot 11 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 6.6000 52.8000 PLOT12 Moisture content of soil at plot 12 numeric(4,1) percent 0.100000 real 5.7000 48.8000 PRIMARY SP00201.DATE SP00201.DEPTH NOTNULL SP00201.DATE SP00201.DEPTH SP00201.FORMAT SP00201.PLOT2 SP00201.PLOT3 SP00201.PLOT4 SP00201.PLOT5 SP00201.PLOT6 SP00201.SITECODE SP00201.STCODE 515 2 SP00202 Soil temperature: SP00202.csv 25793 d3b6816b492529c5f757f90288622e14 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00202_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 2.0000 2.0000 PLOTCODE Specifies if sample from plots 2-6 (forest) or plots 8-12 (clearcut) char(1) 1 Plots 2-6, in forest 2 Plots 8-12, in clearcut DATE Date of measurement datetime YYYY-MM-DD 1.000000 4/18/1960 12:00:00 AM 11/18/1980 12:00:00 AM STEMP061 Soil temperature at plot 2 or 8, depth=.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 31.0000 68.0000 STEMP062 Soil temperature at plot 3 or 9, depth=.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 30.0000 67.0000 STEMP063 Soil temperature at plot 4 or 10, depth=.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 30.0000 73.0000 STEMP064 Soil temperature at plot 5 or 11, depth=.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 29.0000 69.0000 STEMP065 Soil temperature at plot 6 or 12, depth=.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 28.0000 64.0000 STEMP181 Soil temperature at plot 2 or 8, depth=1.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 31.0000 69.0000 STEMP182 Soil temperature at plot 3 or 9, depth=1.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 30.0000 68.0000 STEMP183 Soil temperature at plot 4 or 10, deplth=1.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 31.0000 72.0000 STEMP184 Soil temperature at plot 5 or 11, depth=1.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 30.0000 66.0000 STEMP185 Soil temperature at plot 6 or 12, depth=1.5 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 31.0000 70.0000 STEMP361 Soil temperature at plot 2 or 8, depth=3.0 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 29.0000 65.0000 STEMP362 Soil temperature at plot 3 or 9, depth=3.0 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 29.0000 63.0000 STEMP363 Soil temperature at plot 4 or 10, depth=3.0 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 28.0000 64.0000 STEMP364 Soil temperature at plot 5 or 11, depth=3.0 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 29.0000 61.0000 STEMP365 Soil temperature at plot 6 or 12, depth=3.0 ft numeric(3,0) degrees Fahrenheit 1.000000 natural 34.0000 64.0000 PRIMARY SP00202.DATE SP00202.PLOTCODE NOTNULL SP00202.DATE SP00202.FORMAT SP00202.PLOTCODE SP00202.STCODE 389 3 SP00203 Throughfall: A series of raingages under the forest canopy and in the clearcut, as well as other nearby raingages, can be used to estimate throughfall. SP00203.csv 18624 6e1342d6e8970c00afe467b194cc7945 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00203_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 3.0000 3.0000 DATE Date of measurement datetime YYYY-MM-DD 1.000000 5/9/1960 12:00:00 AM 11/22/1983 12:00:00 AM TRANS1A Forest raingage A numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 20.8200 TRANS1B Forest raingage B numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 14.3800 TRANS1C Forest raingage C numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 8.4800 TRANS1D Forest raingage D numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 10.5000 TRANS1E Forest raingage E numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 5.9400 TRANS2A Clearcut raingage A numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 14.9300 TRANS2B Clearcut raingage B numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 14.8200 TRANS2C Clearcut raingage C numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 8.8200 TRANS2D Clearcut raingage D numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 6.9700 TRANS2E Clearcut raingage E numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 5.6700 CLIMATE2 Climatic Station #2 raingage numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0200 144.0000 FORKS Forks raingage numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0200 16.6000 MGAGE M3 raingage (on M-road as part of early ws 1, 2, 3 rain network) numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0300 16.4000 SITESRG On site standard raingage (in plot 11) serves as standard for all soil moist ure plots numeric(5,2) inches 0.010000 real 0.0000 8.8000 PRIMARY SP00203.DATE NOTNULL SP00203.DATE SP00203.FORMAT SP00203.STCODE 269 4 SP00204 Vegetation cover by species: SP00204.csv 15420 abc76d296fe5b24ea1c161fcdb3ac91e 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00204_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 4.0000 4.0000 YEAR Year of survey numeric(4,0) YYYY 1.000000 VEGTYPE Vegetation type char(1) 1 Herbaceous 2 Woody SPECIES Vegetation genus, species acronym according to Garrison et all., 1972 char(6) ACCI Acer circinatum ANMA Anaphalis margaritacea ANDE Anemone deltoidea BENE Berberis nervosa CESA Ceanothus sanguineus CEVE Ceanothus velutinus CIRSI Cirsium CIAR Cirsium arvense CIBR Cirsium brevifolium CIVU Cirsium vulgare COLA Coptis laciniata COCA Cornus canadensis CONU Cornus nuttallii COCO Cotula coronopifolia DIFO Dicentra formosa EPILO Epilobium EPMI Epilobium minutum EPPA Epilobium paniculatum EPWA Epilobium watsonii FEOC Festuca occidentalis FRSP Frasera speciosa GATR Galium triflorum GASH Gaultheria shallon HIAL Hieracium albiflorum HODI Holodiscus discolor HYPE Hypericum perforatum LIBO Listera borealis LOMI Lotus micranthus LUCO Luzula comosa MAMA Madia madioides POMU Polystichum munitum PSME Pseudotsuga menziesii RHPU Rhamnus purshiana RHMA Rhododendron macrophyllum RISA Ribes sanguineum RULE Rubus leucodermis RUPA Rubus parviflorus RUUR Rubus ursinus SAMBU Sambucus SESY Senecio sylvaticus TABR Taxus brevifolia TRLA Trifolium latifolium TROV Trillium ovatum TSHE Tsuga heterophylla VAPA Vaccinium parvifolium WHMO Whipplea modesta CACH Castanopsis chrysophylla EPAN Epilobium angustifolium GNMI Gnaphalium microcephalum GRAMIN Gramin COVER_8 Percent vegetation cover by species on plot 8 numeric(6,2) percent 0.010000 real 0.0000 41.2800 COVER_9 Percent vegetation cover by species on plot 9 numeric(6,2) percent 0.010000 real 0.0000 72.5000 COVER_10 Percent vegetation cover by species on plot 10 numeric(6,2) percent 0.010000 real 0.0000 66.5000 COVER_11 Percent vegetation cover by species on plot 11 numeric(6,2) percent 0.010000 real 0.0000 45.0000 COVER_12 Percent vegetation cover by species on plot 12 numeric(6,2) percent 0.010000 real 0.0000 75.0000 PRIMARY SP00204.SPECIES SP00204.YEAR NOTNULL SP00204.COVER_10 SP00204.COVER_11 SP00204.COVER_12 SP00204.COVER_8 SP00204.COVER_9 SP00204.FORMAT SP00204.SPECIES SP00204.STCODE SP00204.VEGTYPE SP00204.YEAR 316 5 SP00205 Vegetation cover (on microplots) by cover type: SP00205.csv 26074 bf61ab08a7b3e21454681bcea98bfbcd 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00205_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 5.0000 5.0000 YEAR Year of survey numeric(4,0) YYYY 1.000000 PLOT Macro plot number numeric(2,0) number 1.000000 natural 8.0000 12.0000 PLOTQUAD Plot quadrant (ne, nw, se, sw) char(2) NE Northeast quadrant of plot NW Northwest quadrant of plot SE Southeast quadrant of plot SW Southwest quadrant of plot COVERTYPE Cover type char(2) BG Bare ground LI Litter LO Logs MO Moss SL Slash SO Stones SU Stumps UN Unknown = % cover of herbaceous and some woody species on microplot (1964 - 1967 only) - probably best to recategorize as 'litter'. COVER1 Percent cover in microplot 1 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER2 Percent cover in microplot 2 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER3 Percent cover in microplot 3 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER4 Percent cover in microplot 4 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER5 Percent cover in microplot 5 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER6 Percent cover in microplot 6 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER7 Percent cover in microplot 7 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER8 Percent cover in microplot 8 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 COVER9 Percent cover in microplot 9 numeric(4,0) percent 1.000000 whole 0.0000 100.0000 PRIMARY SP00205.COVERTYPE SP00205.PLOT SP00205.PLOTQUAD SP00205.YEAR NOTNULL SP00205.COVER1 SP00205.COVER2 SP00205.COVER3 SP00205.COVER4 SP00205.COVER5 SP00205.COVER6 SP00205.COVER7 SP00205.COVER8 SP00205.COVER9 SP00205.COVERTYPE SP00205.FORMAT SP00205.PLOT SP00205.PLOTQUAD SP00205.STCODE SP00205.YEAR 545 6 SP00206 Vegetation cover by cover type: SP00206.csv 2524 f184be87d0167aaba23bf45312d44d6d 1 \r\n column , " http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/ltermeta/ltersearch/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SP00206_v2.csv STCODE Study code char(5) SP002 FSDB Database Study Code FORMAT Entity number numeric(1,0) number 1.000000 natural 6.0000 6.0000 YEAR Year of survey numeric(4,0) YYYY 1.000000 COVERTYPE Cover type char(2) BG Bare ground LI Litter LO Logs MO Moss SL Slash SO Stones SU Stumps UN Unknown = % cover of herbaceous and some woody species on microplot (1964 - 1967 only) - probably best to recategorize as 'litter'. COVTYPE_8 Percent cover type in plot 8 numeric(6,1) percent 0.100000 real 0.0000 99.9000 COVTYPE_9 Percent cover type in plot 9 numeric(6,1) percent 0.100000 real 0.0000 100.0000 COVTYPE_10 Percent cover type in plot 10 numeric(6,1) percent 0.100000 real 0.0000 94.9000 COVTYPE_11 Percent cover type in plot 11 numeric(6,1) percent 0.100000 real 0.0000 99.4000 COVTYPE_12 Percent cover type in plot 12 numeric(6,1) percent 0.100000 real 0.0000 95.0000 PRIMARY SP00206.COVERTYPE SP00206.YEAR NOTNULL SP00206.COVERTYPE SP00206.COVTYPE_10 SP00206.COVTYPE_11 SP00206.COVTYPE_12 SP00206.COVTYPE_8 SP00206.COVTYPE_9 SP00206.FORMAT SP00206.STCODE SP00206.YEAR 63 feet; 12 inches Degrees Fahrenheit; an obsolescent unit of temperature still used in popular meteorology; constantToSI= -255.402 inches; an imperial measure of length percent; a number dimensionless number, i.e., ratio, count