uid=AND,o=lter,dc=ecoinformatics,dc=org all public read SS011 Claire Rapp claire.rapp@oregonstate.edu Michael P. Nelson

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-9221 mpnelson@oregonstate.edu http://www.michaelpnelson.com http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-4752 Jeremy T. Bruskotter Bruskotter.9@osu.edu Michael P. Nelson

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-9221 mpnelson@oregonstate.edu http://www.michaelpnelson.com http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-4752 Principal Investigator Jeremy T. Bruskotter Bruskotter.9@osu.edu Principal Investigator Claire Rapp claire.rapp@oregonstate.edu Creator Michael P. Nelson

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-9221 mpnelson@oregonstate.edu http://www.michaelpnelson.com http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6917-4752 Creator Jeremy T. Bruskotter Bruskotter.9@osu.edu Creator 2023-11-07 This dataset records survey data about public land managers who work in Oregon and Washington (Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, Washington Department of Natural Resources). Data was collected in 2023 via the online survey platform Qualtrics. Data collection is complete. The dataset includes measures of managers beliefs about 1) variable density thinning of mature growth forests, 2) salvage logging of burned areas, 3) translocation of plant species from hotter and drier seed zones to adapt to climate change. It includes how managers evaluate the usefulness of scientific evidence and the soundness of action prescriptions for each of the three management issues Respondents were randomly assigned to either receive long-term or short-term studies, and positive or negative results. The dataset includes measures of sense of belonging (how much managers believe they belong at their workplace) and measures of public support/public threat (how much they believe the public understands and supports the actions they take on the landscape). The dataset includes respondent agency. surveys humans LTER controlled vocabulary human dimensions attitudes and perceptions Andrews Experimental Forest site thesaurus Related FilesTitle: Survey LogicDescription: explanation of survey logic including random assignment process and block orderURL: https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ss011/ss011_survey_logic.pdfTitle: Full SurveyDescription: survey questionnaire including full question textURL: https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ss011/ss011_full_survey.pdfTitle: Level III and IV Ecoregions of Western Washington and OregonDescription: Maps of region 10 ecoregions of the Pacific Northwest. From https://www.epa.gov/eco-research/ecoregion-download-files-region#pane-10URL: https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ss011/ecoregion_map.pdf Data Use Agreement: The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. This Data Set is released under the Creative Commons license CC BY "Attribution" (see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Creative Commons license CC BY - Attribution is a license that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work (even commercially), as long as you are credited for the original creation. This license accommodates maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials. It is considered professional conduct and an ethical obligation to acknowledge the work of other scientists. The Data User is asked to provide attribution of the original work if this data package is shared in whole or by individual parts or used in the derivation of other products. A recommended citation is provided for each Data Set in the Andrews LTER data catalog (see: http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/catalog/datacatalog.aspx). A generic citation is also provided for this Data Set on the website https://portal.edirepository.org in the summary metadata page. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed and all data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. General acknowledgement: Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY-4.0 https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/abstract.aspx?dbcode=SS011 Data was collected from public land managers working in Oregon and Washington. -124.51333500 -116.43915400 49.01670300 41.99033500 2023-05-01 2023-08-31 The purpose of this study was to assess how manager values impact perceptions of science. The study examines how confirmation bias affects evidence evaluation and how managers evaluate long-term and short-term scientific studies. It also includes variables to evaluate individual-level differences including sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership.

An update history is logged and maintained with each new version of every dataset.

notPlanned Study code and preliminary metadata established Version1 2023-10-17 Original creation of the entity. Several of the attributes where long text, so created entity 2 for these. Version2 2023-11-07 Information Manager

Andrews Forest LTER Program US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station 3200 SW Jefferson Way Corvallis OR 97331

hjaweb@lists.oregonstate.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Andrews Forest LTER Site

Forest Ecosystems and Society Department in Forestry Oregon State University 201K Richardson Hall Corvallis OR 97331-5752

(541) 737-8480 lterweb@lists.oregonstate.edu http://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/ Field Methods - SS011 We conducted a web-based survey using the Qualtrics survey platform The survey included descriptive measures and a 2x2 experimental design. We measured respondents’ beliefs about salvage logging, thinning, and translocation. Belief questions were measured on a 5-point bi-polar scale (-2 to 2) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree. Next, each respondent was randomly assigned to a condition whereby they received and evaluated results from either a long-term or short-term study. To reduce cognitive load, timeframe varied across respondents but not across management issues within respondents. For each issue, respondents were randomly assigned to either receive positive or negative evidence about the management practice. In the positive condition, the evidence statements suggested the management practice was useful or effective at various goals. In the negative condition, the practice was either ineffective or harmful. For each management issue, respondents rated the usefulness of 3 hypothetical study results for their job. In order to reduce cognitive load, respondents saw only one argument for each management issue, randomly selected from the 3 evidence statements. Respondents rated the soundness of the argument prescribing a management action based on the hypothetical survey results and were asked to explain their answer in an open-ended response. Respondents then answered 5-point bipolar scales about their sense of belonging in the workplace and the extent to which the public supports their unit’s actions. Respondents answered with agency they work for. Processing Procedures - SS011 The data were initially exported from Qualtrics and then cleaned before being uploaded to the repository. Qualtrics-generated variables, including start and end time, how far respondents made it through the survey, how long they spent on the survey, etc. have been removed. Information that could be indirectly identifying (gender, region of work, etc.) have been removed for participant privacy. Respondents who did not pass the initial filter (i.e., respondents who were not managers and therefore not the target of this study and did not see the rest of the survey) have been removed. Respondents who did not answer any questions have been removed. Each respondent has been assigned a 5-digit respondent ID. Data Entry - SS011 Survey data was recorded via Qualtrics, an online survey platform (see survey PDF in related files). After removing data from sensitive questions, the survey questions and responses were transformed into a data table where each attribute represents a question from the questionnaire. The attribute definition references the questionnaire number so that the full context of the question being asked can be accessed. An explanation of survey logic (i.e., random assignment process, block order) is available in the Survey Logic PDF in related files. Sampling frequency: single sampling event The survey features an embedded experimental design. All respondents see the belief, sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership questions. For the scientific evidence statements and action prescription soundness statements, respondents are randomly assigned into one of four conditions: (1) Long-term, negative information, (2) Long-term, positive information, (3) Short-term, negative information, (4) Short-term, positive information. Further, respondents only see one randomly selected soundness argument, randomly selected from the three evidence statements. The research team had emails lists for all employees working for the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, and Washington Department of Natural Resources. The research team removed contacts that were not considered “managers” defined as “people who are engaged in planning and implementing management actions on a landscape”. Examples of positions excluded include Human Resources, Information Technology, front office staff, field technicians, and research staff. All remaining contacts (n = 2,273) were invited to participate in the survey. 568 people clicked on the survey (response rate 25%), 461 identified as managers (20% adjusted response rate). After removing respondents who did not answer any questions beyond the filter (e.g., they clicked through the survey but did not answer any questions), the final sample size is 410. For the Forest Service, the survey was distributed by a member of the Forest Service to internal listservs. The exact number of people on the listservs, and how many of them were managers is unknown. It is estimated there were approximately 450 people in the Forest Service listserv. 38 clicked on the survey and 33 identified as managers. Only respondents who identified as managers are included in the dataset. Given the response rate for Department of the Interior and State Agencies, and the non-representative sampling of Forest Service employees, when it comes to descriptive statistics, the database should be interpreted cautiously as a representative sample of PNW public land managers. Posy Elizabeth Busby

Assistant Professor OSU Botany & Plant Pathology

busbyp@science.oregonstate.edu posybusby@gmail.com http://bpp.oregonstate.edu/content/posy-busby http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-9820 Principal Investigator Matthew G Betts

Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201E Richardson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

(541) 737-3841 matt.betts@oregonstate.edu http://www.fsl.orst.edu/flel/index.htm http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551 Principal Investigator Brooke E. Penaluna brooke.penaluna@usda.gov Brooke.Penaluna@oregonstate.edu https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/lwm/aem/people/penaluna.html http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-770X Principal Investigator Catalina Segura

Assistant Professor; Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management; Oregon State University Corvallis OR 97331

541-737-6568 catalina.segura@oregonstate.edu http://ferm.forestry.oregonstate.edu/facstaff/segura-catalina http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0924-1172 Principal Investigator David Bell david.bell@usda.gov david.bell@oregonstate.edu https://lemma.forestry.oregonstate.edu/about/david-bell http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-5836 Principal Investigator The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest is a living laboratory that provides unparalleled opportunities for the study of forest and stream ecosystems in the central Cascade Range of Oregon. Since 1980, as a part of the National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-LTER) program, the Andrews Experimental Forest has become a leader in the analysis of forest and stream ecosystem dynamics. Long-term field experiments and measurement programs have focused on climate dynamics, streamflow, water quality, and vegetation succession. Currently researchers are working to develop concepts and tools needed to predict effects of natural disturbance, land use, and climate change on ecosystem structure, function, and species composition. The Andrews Experimental Forest is administered cooperatively by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University and the Willamette National Forest. Funding for the research program comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and other sources. Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. National Science Foundation: DEB2025755 National Science Foundation https://ror.org/021nxhr62 DEB2025755 https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=2025755 The Andrews Forest is situated in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, and covers the entire 15,800-acre (6400-ha) drainage basin of Lookout Creek. Elevation ranges from 1350 to 5340 feet (410 to 1630 m). Broadly representative of the rugged mountainous landscape of the Pacific Northwest, the Andrews Forest contains excellent examples of the region's conifer forests and associated wildlife and stream ecosystems. These forests are among the tallest and most productive in the world, with tree heights of often greater than 250 ft (75 m). Streams are steep, cold and clean, providing habitat for numerous aquatic organisms. SS01101 Survey results of PNW public land managers science and values questionnaire quantitative representation of survey results SS01101_v1.csv 282249 4f24cde6454017cfed608e2db2023941 1 \r\n column , " https://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/register/dataaccess.aspx?docid=SS01101_v1.csv 2023-05-15 2023-09-15 DBCODE FSDB Database Code char(5) SS011 FSDB Database Study Code SS011 ENTITY Entity number numeric(2,0) number 1 natural 1.0000 1.0000 RID Unique respondent identifier char(5) Unique respondent identifier BELIEF_SALVAGE1 Survey Q4.2 In general, I think salvage logging is a good management action. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_SALVAGE2 Survey Q4.3 Salvage logging is an effective tool for reducing future fire severity. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_SALVAGE3 Survey Q4.4 Salvage logging is necessary if we hope to reduce future fire risk. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_SALVAGE4 Survey Q4.5 On my unit, salvage logging is a politically feasible management action. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_SALVAGE5 Survey Q4.6 I think salvage logging aligns with the mission of my agency. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_SALVAGE6 Survey Q4.7 The issue of salvage logging is relevant to my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN1 Survey Q5.2 In general, I think thinning mature growth stands is a good management action. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN2 Survey Q5.3 Thinning mature growth stands is an effective tool for creating forests with the structure and function of old growth. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN3 Survey Q5.4 Variable density thinning is necessary if we hope to speed up the rate at which mature growth becomes old growth. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN4 Survey Q5.5 On my unit, variable density thinning of mature growth stands is a politically feasible management action. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN5 Survey Q5.6 I think thinning mature growth forests aligns with the mission of my agency. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_THIN6 Survey Q5.7 The issue of variable density thinning of mature growth forests is relevant to my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS1 Survey Q6.2 In general, I think translocation is a good response to climate change. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS2 Survey Q6.3 Translocating plant species now is an effective way to adapt to climate change over the next 100 years. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS3 Survey Q6.4 Translocating plant species now is necessary if we hope to maintain the structure and function of our ecosystems over the next 100 years. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS4 Survey Q6.5 On my unit, translocating plant species is a politically feasible management action. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS5 Survey Q6.7 I think it aligns with my agency's mission to translocate plant species in my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELIEF_TRANS6 Survey Q6.7 The issue of translocation is relevant to my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE1 Survery question 8.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on soil erosion char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE2 Survey question 8.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on tree recruitment char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE3 Survey question 8.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on smoke char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_PRO_SALVAGE Survey question 8.5-8.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_SALVAGE First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q8.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q8.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE1 Survery question 9.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on soil erosion char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE2 Survey question 9.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on tree recruitment char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE3 Survey question 9.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on smoke char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE Survey question 9.5-9.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q9.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q9.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_ST_ANTI_THIN1 Survery question 10.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on transition char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_THIN2 Survey question 10.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on fire resistance char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_THIN3 Survey question 10.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on drought char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_ANTI_THIN Survey question 10.5-10.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_THIN First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q10.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q10.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_ST_PRO_THIN1 Survery question 11.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on transition char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_THIN2 Survey question 11.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on fire resistance char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_THIN3 Survey question 11.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on drought char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_PRO_THIN Survey question 11.5-11.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_THIN First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q11.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q11.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_ST_PRO_TRANS1 Survery question 12.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on meadow char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_TRANS2 Survey question 12.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on canopy cover char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_PRO_TRANS3 Survey question 12.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on timber char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_PRO_TRANS Survey question 12.5-12.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_TRANS First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q12.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q12.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS1 Survery question 13.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on meadow char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS2 Survey question 13.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on canopy cover char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS3 Survey question 13.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on timber char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_ST_ANTI_TRANS Survey question 13.5-13.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_TRANS First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q13.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q13.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE1 Survery question 14.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on soil erosion char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE2 Survey question 14.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on tree recruitment char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE3 Survey question 14.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on smoke char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_PRO_SALVAGE Survey question 14.5-14.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_SALVAGE First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q14.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q14.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE1 Survery question 15.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on soil erosion char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE2 Survey question 15.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on tree recruitment char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE3 Survey question 15.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on smoke char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE Survey question 15.5-15.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q15.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q15.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_PRO_THIN1 Survery question 16.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on transition char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_THIN2 Survey question 16.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on fire resistance char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_THIN3 Survey question 16.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on drought char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_PRO_THIN Survey question 16.5-16.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_THIN First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q16.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q16.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_ANTI_THIN1 Survery question 17.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on transition char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_THIN2 Survey question 17.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on fire resistance char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_THIN3 Survey question 17.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on drought char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_ANTI_THIN Survey question 17.5-17.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_THIN First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q17.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q17.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_PRO_TRANS1 Survery question 18.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on meadow char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_TRANS2 Survey question 18.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on canopy cover char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_PRO_TRANS3 Survey question 18.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on timber char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_PRO_TRANS Survey question 18.5-18.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_TRANS First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q18.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q18.8 (see entity 2 for full text) USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS1 Survery question 19.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on meadow char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS2 Survey question 19.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on canopy cover char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS3 Survey question 19.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on timber char(2) -2 Not at all useful -1 Slightly useful 0 Moderately useful 1 Very useful 2 Extremely useful NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. SOUND_LT_ANTI_TRANS Survey question 19.5-19.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument" char(2) -2 Not at all sound -1 Slightly sound 0 Moderately sound 1 Very sound 2 Extremely sound NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_TRANS First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q19.8 (see entity 2 for full text) varchar(254) First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q19.8 (see entity 2 for full text) BELONG1 Survey Q20.2 I get along with the people in my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELONG2 Survey Q20.3 My coworkers have similar interests and hobbies as me. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELONG3 Survey Q20.4 I am friends with my coworkers. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELONG4 Survey Q20.5 I agree with the values of my agency. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELONG5 Survey Q20.6 I agree with the priorities of my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. BELONG6 Survey Q20.7 My supervisor and I have similar values. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT1 Survey Q21.2 The public doesn't understand the objectives of my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT2_O Survey Q21.3 The public supports the decisions of my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT3 Survey Q21.4 I am always prepared for someone in the public to legally challenge my unit's decisions. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT4_O Survey Q21.5 The public trusts the professional expertise of my unit. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT5 Survey Q21.6 On my unit, we struggle to find decisions supported by most members of the public. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. THREAT6_O Survey Q21.7 My unit has a good relationship with the public. char(2) -2 Strongly Disagree -1 Somewhat disagree 0 Neither agree nor disagree 1 Somewhat agree 2 Strongly Agree NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. AGENCY_STRING Survey Q22.2 Which agency do you currently work for? char(6) BLM Employed by Bureau of Land Management NPS Employed by National Park Service USFS Employed by US Forest Service ODF Employed by Oregon Department of Forestry WDNR Employed by Washington Department of Natural Resources USFWS Employed by US Fish and Wildlife Service OTHER For any other agency NA Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey. REGION Survey Q22.6 Level III Ecoregion of the Pacific Northwest where respondent works varchar(254) Survey Q22.6 Level III Ecoregion of the Pacific Northwest where respondent works SALVAGE Experimental condition for all salvage logging evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness) char(7) LT-ANTI For salvage questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence ST-PRO For salvage questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence ST-ANTI For salvage questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence LT-PRO For salvage questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the salvage block. THIN Experimental condition for all thinning evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness) char(7) LT-ANTI For thinning questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence ST-PRO For thinning questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence ST-ANTI For thinning questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence LT-PRO For thinning questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the thin block. TRANS Experimental condition for all translocation evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness) char(7) LT-ANTI For translocation questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence ST-PRO For translocation questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence ST-ANTI For translocation questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence LT-PRO For translocation questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the trans block. SALVAGE_ARGUMENT Code for which evidence statement was selected for the salvage action prescription (soundness) char(12) Smoke Respondent saw evidence statement about smoke for salvage soundness argument Soil Erosion Respondent saw evidence statement about soil erosion for salvage soundness argument Recruitment Respondent saw evidence statement about recruitment for salvage soundness argument NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the salvage_argument question. THIN_ARGUMENT Code for which evidence statement was selected for the thinning action prescription (soundness) char(15) Transition Respondent saw evidence statement about transition for thinning soundness argument Drought Stress Respondent saw evidence statement about drought stress for thinning soundness argument Fire Resistance Respondent saw evidence statement about fire resistance for thinning soundness argument NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the thin_argument question. TRANS_ARGUMENT Code for which evidence statement was selected for the translocation action prescription (soundness) char(12) Canopy Cover Respondent saw evidence statement about canopy cover for translocation soundness argument Timber Respondent saw evidence statement about timber for translocation soundness argument Meadow Respondent saw evidence statement about meadows for translocation soundness argument NA Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the trans_argument question. PRIMARY SS01101.RID NOTNULL SS01101.AGENCY_STRING SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE1 SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE2 SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE3 SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE4 SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE5 SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE6 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN1 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN2 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN3 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN4 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN5 SS01101.BELIEF_THIN6 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS1 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS2 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS3 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS4 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS5 SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS6 SS01101.BELONG1 SS01101.BELONG2 SS01101.BELONG3 SS01101.BELONG4 SS01101.BELONG5 SS01101.BELONG6 SS01101.DBCODE SS01101.ENTITY SS01101.RID SS01101.REGION SS01101.SALVAGE SS01101.SALVAGE_ARGUMENT SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_THIN SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_TRANS SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_SALVAGE SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_THIN SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_TRANS SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_THIN SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_TRANS SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_SALVAGE SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_THIN SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_TRANS SS01101.THIN SS01101.THIN_ARGUMENT SS01101.THREAT1 SS01101.THREAT2_O SS01101.THREAT3 SS01101.THREAT4_O SS01101.THREAT5 SS01101.THREAT6_O SS01101.TRANS SS01101.TRANS_ARGUMENT SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE1 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE2 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE3 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN1 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN2 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN3 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS1 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS2 SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS3 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE1 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE2 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE3 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN1 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN2 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN3 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS1 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS2 SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS3 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE1 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE2 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE3 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN1 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN2 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN3 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS1 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS2 SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS3 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE1 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE2 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE3 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN1 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN2 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN3 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS1 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS2 SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS3 409 Long text explanations from survey based on attributes from entity 1 readable text file of long text fields ss01102_v1.txt 1048576 6b6d5ff87878d0ac35773675f06951e1 txt text file https://andrewsforest.oregonstate.edu/data/studies/ss011/ss01102_v1.txt ASCII format (text) dimensionless number, i.e., ratio, count