Did You Find What You Needed?

We'd love to know how your experience with the Andrews Forest data catalog went - whether you found exactly what you were looking for or hit a dead end. Your feedback helps us improve data discovery and access.

Share Your Feedback

SS011: Survey of Pacific Northwest public land managers science and values project, 2023

← Back to catalog index

Go to Data Downloads Download Metadata Text (.txt) View Metadata in Browser (HTML) Download Metadata CSV (ZIP)

Status: notPlanned
Period: 2023-05-01 to 2023-08-31
Version: 2
Published: 2023-11-07
EDI Package ID: knb-lter-and.12081.2
Source XML: SS011_2.xml

Notice

"As Is" Basis: All content, including maps and forecasts, is provided without warranties. Users are advised to independently verify critical information.

Citation

Rapp, C.; Nelson, M.; Bruskotter, J. 2023. Survey of Pacific Northwest public land managers science and values project, 2023 Long-Term Ecological Research Andrews Forest LTER Site. [Database]. Available: https://andrewsforest-stage.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/fsdb-data-catalog/SS011 Accessed 2026-05-10.

Abstract

This dataset records survey data about public land managers who work in Oregon and Washington (Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, Washington Department of Natural Resources). Data was collected in 2023 via the online survey platform Qualtrics. Data collection is complete. The dataset includes measures of managers beliefs about 1) variable density thinning of mature growth forests, 2) salvage logging of burned areas, 3) translocation of plant species from hotter and drier seed zones to adapt to climate change. It includes how managers evaluate the usefulness of scientific evidence and the soundness of action prescriptions for each of the three management issues Respondents were randomly assigned to either receive long-term or short-term studies, and positive or negative results. The dataset includes measures of sense of belonging (how much managers believe they belong at their workplace) and measures of public support/public threat (how much they believe the public understands and supports the actions they take on the landscape). The dataset includes respondent agency.

Coverage

Temporal coverage: 2023-05-01 to 2023-08-31

Geographic coverage: Data was collected from public land managers working in Oregon and Washington.

Spatial coverage:

Bounds: W -124.51333500, E -116.43915400, N 49.01670300, S 41.99033500

Purpose
  • The purpose of this study was to assess how manager values impact perceptions of science. The study examines how confirmation bias affects evidence evaluation and how managers evaluate long-term and short-term scientific studies. It also includes variables to evaluate individual-level differences including sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership.
Project

Title: Long-Term Ecological Research

Personnel
  • Posy Elizabeth Busby - Principal Investigator
    Assistant Professor OSU Botany & Plant Pathology
    Email: busbyp@science.oregonstate.edu, posybusby@gmail.com
    ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-9820
  • Matthew G Betts - Principal Investigator
    Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201E Richardson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331
    Phone: (541) 737-3841
    Email: matt.betts@oregonstate.edu
    ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551
  • Brooke E. Penaluna - Principal Investigator
    Email: brooke.penaluna@usda.gov, Brooke.Penaluna@oregonstate.edu
    ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7215-770X
  • Catalina Segura - Principal Investigator
    Assistant Professor; Department of Forest Engineering, Resources, and Management; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331
    Phone: 541-737-6568
    Email: catalina.segura@oregonstate.edu
    ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0924-1172
  • David Bell - Principal Investigator
    Email: david.bell@usda.gov, david.bell@oregonstate.edu
    ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2673-5836
Abstract
  • The H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest is a living laboratory that provides unparalleled opportunities for the study of forest and stream ecosystems in the central Cascade Range of Oregon. Since 1980, as a part of the National Science Foundation Long Term Ecological Research (NSF-LTER) program, the Andrews Experimental Forest has become a leader in the analysis of forest and stream ecosystem dynamics.
  • Long-term field experiments and measurement programs have focused on climate dynamics, streamflow, water quality, and vegetation succession. Currently researchers are working to develop concepts and tools needed to predict effects of natural disturbance, land use, and climate change on ecosystem structure, function, and species composition.
  • The Andrews Experimental Forest is administered cooperatively by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University and the Willamette National Forest. Funding for the research program comes from the National Science Foundation (NSF), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, Oregon State University, and other sources.
Funding

Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University. National Science Foundation: DEB2025755

Awards
Study Area Description
  • Long-Term Ecological Research
    The Andrews Forest is situated in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, and covers the entire 15,800-acre (6400-ha) drainage basin of Lookout Creek. Elevation ranges from 1350 to 5340 feet (410 to 1630 m). Broadly representative of the rugged mountainous landscape of the Pacific Northwest, the Andrews Forest contains excellent examples of the region's conifer forests and associated wildlife and stream ecosystems. These forests are among the tallest and most productive in the world, with tree heights of often greater than 250 ft (75 m). Streams are steep, cold and clean, providing habitat for numerous aquatic organisms.
Associated Party
  • Michael P. Nelson
    Role: Principal Investigator
    Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331
    Phone: 541-737-9221
    Email: mpnelson@oregonstate.edu
  • Jeremy T. Bruskotter
    Role: Principal Investigator
    Email: Bruskotter.9@osu.edu
  • Claire Rapp
    Role: Creator
    Email: claire.rapp@oregonstate.edu
  • Michael P. Nelson
    Role: Creator
    Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society; 201K Richarson Hall; College of Forestry; Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331
    Phone: 541-737-9221
    Email: mpnelson@oregonstate.edu
  • Jeremy T. Bruskotter
    Role: Creator
    Email: Bruskotter.9@osu.edu
Contact
  • Information Manager
    Andrews Forest LTER Program, US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR, 97331
    Email: hjaweb@lists.oregonstate.edu
Publisher
  • Andrews Forest LTER Site
    Role: Publisher
    Forest Ecosystems and Society Department in Forestry, Oregon State University, 201K Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331-5752
    Phone: (541) 737-8480
    Email: lterweb@lists.oregonstate.edu
Study Description

This dataset records survey data about public land managers who work in Oregon and Washington (Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, Washington Department of Natural Resources). Data was collected in 2023 via the online survey platform Qualtrics. Data collection is complete. The dataset includes measures of managers beliefs about 1) variable density thinning of mature growth forests, 2) salvage logging of burned areas, 3) translocation of plant species from hotter and drier seed zones to adapt to climate change. It includes how managers evaluate the usefulness of scientific evidence and the soundness of action prescriptions for each of the three management issues Respondents were randomly assigned to either receive long-term or short-term studies, and positive or negative results. The dataset includes measures of sense of belonging (how much managers believe they belong at their workplace) and measures of public support/public threat (how much they believe the public understands and supports the actions they take on the landscape). The dataset includes respondent agency. The purpose of this study was to assess how manager values impact perceptions of science. The study examines how confirmation bias affects evidence evaluation and how managers evaluate long-term and short-term scientific studies. It also includes variables to evaluate individual-level differences including sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership. Field Methods - SS011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess how manager values impact perceptions of science. The study examines how confirmation bias affects evidence evaluation and how managers evaluate long-term and short-term scientific studies. It also includes variables to evaluate individual-level differences including sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership.

Methods

Method Steps

Field Methods - SS011
  • We conducted a web-based survey using the Qualtrics survey platform The survey included descriptive measures and a 2x2 experimental design. We measured respondents’ beliefs about salvage logging, thinning, and translocation. Belief questions were measured on a 5-point bi-polar scale (-2 to 2) from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.
  • Next, each respondent was randomly assigned to a condition whereby they received and evaluated results from either a long-term or short-term study. To reduce cognitive load, timeframe varied across respondents but not across management issues within respondents. For each issue, respondents were randomly assigned to either receive positive or negative evidence about the management practice. In the positive condition, the evidence statements suggested the management practice was useful or effective at various goals. In the negative condition, the practice was either ineffective or harmful. For each management issue, respondents rated the usefulness of 3 hypothetical study results for their job. In order to reduce cognitive load, respondents saw only one argument for each management issue, randomly selected from the 3 evidence statements. Respondents rated the soundness of the argument prescribing a management action based on the hypothetical survey results and were asked to explain their answer in an open-ended response. Respondents then answered 5-point bipolar scales about their sense of belonging in the workplace and the extent to which the public supports their unit’s actions. Respondents answered with agency they work for.
Processing Procedures - SS011
  • The data were initially exported from Qualtrics and then cleaned before being uploaded to the repository. Qualtrics-generated variables, including start and end time, how far respondents made it through the survey, how long they spent on the survey, etc. have been removed. Information that could be indirectly identifying (gender, region of work, etc.) have been removed for participant privacy. Respondents who did not pass the initial filter (i.e., respondents who were not managers and therefore not the target of this study and did not see the rest of the survey) have been removed. Respondents who did not answer any questions have been removed. Each respondent has been assigned a 5-digit respondent ID.
Data Entry - SS011
  • Survey data was recorded via Qualtrics, an online survey platform (see survey PDF in related files). After removing data from sensitive questions, the survey questions and responses were transformed into a data table where each attribute represents a question from the questionnaire. The attribute definition references the questionnaire number so that the full context of the question being asked can be accessed. An explanation of survey logic (i.e., random assignment process, block order) is available in the Survey Logic PDF in related files.

Sampling

Study Extent
  • Sampling frequency: single sampling event
Sampling Description
  • The survey features an embedded experimental design. All respondents see the belief, sense of belonging, public support, and agency membership questions. For the scientific evidence statements and action prescription soundness statements, respondents are randomly assigned into one of four conditions: (1) Long-term, negative information, (2) Long-term, positive information, (3) Short-term, negative information, (4) Short-term, positive information.
  • Further, respondents only see one randomly selected soundness argument, randomly selected from the three evidence statements.
  • The research team had emails lists for all employees working for the National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Department of Forestry, and Washington Department of Natural Resources. The research team removed contacts that were not considered “managers” defined as “people who are engaged in planning and implementing management actions on a landscape”. Examples of positions excluded include Human Resources, Information Technology, front office staff, field technicians, and research staff. All remaining contacts (n = 2,273) were invited to participate in the survey. 568 people clicked on the survey (response rate 25%), 461 identified as managers (20% adjusted response rate). After removing respondents who did not answer any questions beyond the filter (e.g., they clicked through the survey but did not answer any questions), the final sample size is 410.
  • For the Forest Service, the survey was distributed by a member of the Forest Service to internal listservs. The exact number of people on the listservs, and how many of them were managers is unknown. It is estimated there were approximately 450 people in the Forest Service listserv. 38 clicked on the survey and 33 identified as managers.
  • Only respondents who identified as managers are included in the dataset. Given the response rate for Department of the Interior and State Agencies, and the non-representative sampling of Forest Service employees, when it comes to descriptive statistics, the database should be interpreted cautiously as a representative sample of PNW public land managers.
Software

No software entries listed in this EML file.

Keywords
  • LTER controlled vocabulary: surveys (theme), humans (theme)
  • Andrews Experimental Forest site thesaurus: human dimensions (theme), attitudes and perceptions (theme)
Taxonomic Hierarchy

No taxonomic hierarchy listed in this EML file.

Data Entities
# Entity Metadata Data
1 SS01101
Survey results of PNW public land managers science and values questionnaire
quantitative representation of survey results
 METADATA DATA
Metadata
SS01101 - Survey results of PNW public land managers science and values questionnaire

Object name: SS01101_v1.csv

Records: 409

Attributes: 101

Temporal coverage: 2023-05-15 to 2023-09-15

File size: 282249 byte

Checksum (MD5): 4f24cde6454017cfed608e2db2023941

Format: headers=1, recordDelimiter=\r\n, fieldDelimiter=,, quoteCharacter=", orientation=column

Constraints (2)
  • primaryKey: PRIMARY
    SS01101.RID
  • notNullConstraint: NOTNULL
    SS01101.AGENCY_STRING, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE1, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE2, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE3, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE4, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE5, SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE6, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN1, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN2, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN3, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN4, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN5, SS01101.BELIEF_THIN6, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS1, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS2, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS3, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS4, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS5, SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS6, SS01101.BELONG1, SS01101.BELONG2, SS01101.BELONG3, SS01101.BELONG4, SS01101.BELONG5, SS01101.BELONG6, SS01101.DBCODE, SS01101.ENTITY, SS01101.RID, SS01101.REGION, SS01101.SALVAGE, SS01101.SALVAGE_ARGUMENT, SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE, SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_THIN, SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_TRANS, SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_SALVAGE, SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_THIN, SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_TRANS, SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE, SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_THIN, SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_TRANS, SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_SALVAGE, SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_THIN, SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_TRANS, SS01101.THIN, SS01101.THIN_ARGUMENT, SS01101.THREAT1, SS01101.THREAT2_O, SS01101.THREAT3, SS01101.THREAT4_O, SS01101.THREAT5, SS01101.THREAT6_O, SS01101.TRANS, SS01101.TRANS_ARGUMENT, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE1, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE2, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE3, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN1, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN2, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN3, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS1, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS2, SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS3, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE1, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE2, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE3, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN1, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN2, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN3, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS1, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS2, SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS3, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE1, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE2, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE3, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN1, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN2, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN3, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS1, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS2, SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS3, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE1, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE2, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE3, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN1, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN2, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN3, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS1, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS2, SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS3
Attributes (101)
DBCODE - char(5) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.DBCODE

FSDB Database Code

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (1)
  • SS011
    FSDB Database Study Code SS011
ENTITY - numeric(2,0) (ratio)

ID: SS01101.ENTITY

Entity number

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Unit: number

Precision: 1

Numeric domain: type=natural, min=1.0000 (exclusive=false), max=1.0000 (exclusive=false)

RID - char(5) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.RID

Unique respondent identifier

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

BELIEF_SALVAGE1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE1

Survey Q4.2 In general, I think salvage logging is a good management action.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_SALVAGE2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE2

Survey Q4.3 Salvage logging is an effective tool for reducing future fire severity.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_SALVAGE3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE3

Survey Q4.4 Salvage logging is necessary if we hope to reduce future fire risk.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_SALVAGE4 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE4

Survey Q4.5 On my unit, salvage logging is a politically feasible management action.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_SALVAGE5 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE5

Survey Q4.6 I think salvage logging aligns with the mission of my agency.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_SALVAGE6 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_SALVAGE6

Survey Q4.7 The issue of salvage logging is relevant to my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN1

Survey Q5.2 In general, I think thinning mature growth stands is a good management action.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN2

Survey Q5.3 Thinning mature growth stands is an effective tool for creating forests with the structure and function of old growth.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN3

Survey Q5.4 Variable density thinning is necessary if we hope to speed up the rate at which mature growth becomes old growth.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN4 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN4

Survey Q5.5 On my unit, variable density thinning of mature growth stands is a politically feasible management action.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN5 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN5

Survey Q5.6 I think thinning mature growth forests aligns with the mission of my agency.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_THIN6 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_THIN6

Survey Q5.7 The issue of variable density thinning of mature growth forests is relevant to my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS1

Survey Q6.2 In general, I think translocation is a good response to climate change.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS2

Survey Q6.3 Translocating plant species now is an effective way to adapt to climate change over the next 100 years.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS3

Survey Q6.4 Translocating plant species now is necessary if we hope to maintain the structure and function of our ecosystems over the next 100 years.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS4 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS4

Survey Q6.5 On my unit, translocating plant species is a politically feasible management action.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS5 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS5

Survey Q6.7 I think it aligns with my agency's mission to translocate plant species in my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELIEF_TRANS6 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELIEF_TRANS6

Survey Q6.7 The issue of translocation is relevant to my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE1

Survery question 8.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on soil erosion

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE2

Survey question 8.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on tree recruitment

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_SALVAGE3

Survey question 8.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-salvage on smoke

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_PRO_SALVAGE - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_SALVAGE

Survey question 8.5-8.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_SALVAGE - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_SALVAGE

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q8.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE1

Survery question 9.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on soil erosion

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE2

Survey question 9.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on tree recruitment

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE3

Survey question 9.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-salvage on smoke

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE

Survey question 9.5-9.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_SALVAGE

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q9.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_ST_ANTI_THIN1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN1

Survery question 10.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on transition

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_THIN2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN2

Survey question 10.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on fire resistance

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_THIN3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_THIN3

Survey question 10.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-thin on drought

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_ANTI_THIN - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_THIN

Survey question 10.5-10.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_THIN - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_THIN

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q10.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_ST_PRO_THIN1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN1

Survery question 11.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on transition

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_THIN2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN2

Survey question 11.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on fire resistance

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_THIN3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_THIN3

Survey question 11.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-thin on drought

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_PRO_THIN - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_THIN

Survey question 11.5-11.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_THIN - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_THIN

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q11.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_ST_PRO_TRANS1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS1

Survery question 12.2 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on meadow

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_TRANS2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS2

Survey question 12.3 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on canopy cover

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_PRO_TRANS3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_PRO_TRANS3

Survey question 12.4 on usefulness, short-term, pro-translocation on timber

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_PRO_TRANS - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_PRO_TRANS

Survey question 12.5-12.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_TRANS - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_PRO_TRANS

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q12.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS1

Survery question 13.2 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on meadow

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS2

Survey question 13.3 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on canopy cover

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_ST_ANTI_TRANS3

Survey question 13.4 on usefulness, short-term, anti-translocation on timber

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_ST_ANTI_TRANS - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_ST_ANTI_TRANS

Survey question 13.5-13.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_TRANS - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_ST_ANTI_TRANS

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q13.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE1

Survery question 14.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on soil erosion

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE2

Survey question 14.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on tree recruitment

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_SALVAGE3

Survey question 14.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-salvage on smoke

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_PRO_SALVAGE - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_SALVAGE

Survey question 14.5-14.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_SALVAGE - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_SALVAGE

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q14.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE1

Survery question 15.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on soil erosion

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE2

Survey question 15.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on tree recruitment

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE3

Survey question 15.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-salvage on smoke

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE

Survey question 15.5-15.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "salvage_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_SALVAGE

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q15.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_PRO_THIN1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN1

Survery question 16.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on transition

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_THIN2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN2

Survey question 16.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on fire resistance

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_THIN3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_THIN3

Survey question 16.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-thin on drought

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_PRO_THIN - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_THIN

Survey question 16.5-16.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_THIN - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_THIN

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q16.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_ANTI_THIN1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN1

Survery question 17.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on transition

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_THIN2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN2

Survey question 17.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on fire resistance

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_THIN3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_THIN3

Survey question 17.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-thin on drought

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_ANTI_THIN - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_THIN

Survey question 17.5-17.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "thin_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_THIN - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_THIN

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q17.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_PRO_TRANS1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS1

Survery question 18.2 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on meadow

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_TRANS2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS2

Survey question 18.3 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on canopy cover

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_PRO_TRANS3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_PRO_TRANS3

Survey question 18.4 on usefulness, long-term, pro-translocation on timber

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_PRO_TRANS - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_PRO_TRANS

Survey question 18.5-18.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_TRANS - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_PRO_TRANS

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q18.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS1

Survery question 19.2 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on meadow

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS2

Survey question 19.3 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on canopy cover

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.USE_LT_ANTI_TRANS3

Survey question 19.4 on usefulness, long-term, anti-translocation on timber

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all useful
  • -1
    Slightly useful
  • code
    Moderately useful
  • 1
    Very useful
  • 2
    Extremely useful
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
SOUND_LT_ANTI_TRANS - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SOUND_LT_ANTI_TRANS

Survey question 19.5-19.8; argument based on one evidence statement, see attribute "trans_argument"

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Not at all sound
  • -1
    Slightly sound
  • code
    Moderately sound
  • 1
    Very sound
  • 2
    Extremely sound
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_TRANS - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.EXPLAIN_LT_ANTI_TRANS

First 254 characters of open-ended response to Q19.8 (see entity 2 for full text)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

BELONG1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG1

Survey Q20.2 I get along with the people in my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELONG2 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG2

Survey Q20.3 My coworkers have similar interests and hobbies as me.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELONG3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG3

Survey Q20.4 I am friends with my coworkers.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELONG4 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG4

Survey Q20.5 I agree with the values of my agency.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELONG5 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG5

Survey Q20.6 I agree with the priorities of my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
BELONG6 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.BELONG6

Survey Q20.7 My supervisor and I have similar values.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT1 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT1

Survey Q21.2 The public doesn't understand the objectives of my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT2_O - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT2_O

Survey Q21.3 The public supports the decisions of my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT3 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT3

Survey Q21.4 I am always prepared for someone in the public to legally challenge my unit's decisions.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT4_O - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT4_O

Survey Q21.5 The public trusts the professional expertise of my unit.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT5 - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT5

Survey Q21.6 On my unit, we struggle to find decisions supported by most members of the public.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
THREAT6_O - char(2) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THREAT6_O

Survey Q21.7 My unit has a good relationship with the public.

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (6)
  • -2
    Strongly Disagree
  • -1
    Somewhat disagree
  • code
    Neither agree nor disagree
  • 1
    Somewhat agree
  • 2
    Strongly Agree
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
AGENCY_STRING - char(6) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.AGENCY_STRING

Survey Q22.2 Which agency do you currently work for?

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (8)
  • BLM
    Employed by Bureau of Land Management
  • NPS
    Employed by National Park Service
  • USFS
    Employed by US Forest Service
  • ODF
    Employed by Oregon Department of Forestry
  • WDNR
    Employed by Washington Department of Natural Resources
  • USFWS
    Employed by US Fish and Wildlife Service
  • OTHER
    For any other agency
  • NA
    Respondent did not provide a response to the question. Respondent may have skipped the question or did not see that part of the survey.
REGION - varchar(254) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.REGION

Survey Q22.6 Level III Ecoregion of the Pacific Northwest where respondent works

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

SALVAGE - char(7) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SALVAGE

Experimental condition for all salvage logging evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (5)
  • LT-ANTI
    For salvage questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence
  • ST-PRO
    For salvage questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence
  • ST-ANTI
    For salvage questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence
  • LT-PRO
    For salvage questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the salvage block.
THIN - char(7) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THIN

Experimental condition for all thinning evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (5)
  • LT-ANTI
    For thinning questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence
  • ST-PRO
    For thinning questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence
  • ST-ANTI
    For thinning questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence
  • LT-PRO
    For thinning questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the thin block.
TRANS - char(7) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.TRANS

Experimental condition for all translocation evidence statements and action prescriptions (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (5)
  • LT-ANTI
    For translocation questions, the respondent received long-term, negative evidence
  • ST-PRO
    For translocation questions, the respondent received short-term, positive evidence
  • ST-ANTI
    For translocation questions, the respondent received short-term, negative evidence
  • LT-PRO
    For translocation questions, the respondent received long-term, positive evidence
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the trans block.
SALVAGE_ARGUMENT - char(12) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.SALVAGE_ARGUMENT

Code for which evidence statement was selected for the salvage action prescription (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (4)
  • Smoke
    Respondent saw evidence statement about smoke for salvage soundness argument
  • Soil Erosion
    Respondent saw evidence statement about soil erosion for salvage soundness argument
  • Recruitment
    Respondent saw evidence statement about recruitment for salvage soundness argument
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the salvage_argument question.
THIN_ARGUMENT - char(15) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.THIN_ARGUMENT

Code for which evidence statement was selected for the thinning action prescription (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (4)
  • Transition
    Respondent saw evidence statement about transition for thinning soundness argument
  • Drought Stress
    Respondent saw evidence statement about drought stress for thinning soundness argument
  • Fire Resistance
    Respondent saw evidence statement about fire resistance for thinning soundness argument
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the thin_argument question.
TRANS_ARGUMENT - char(12) (nominal)

ID: SS01101.TRANS_ARGUMENT

Code for which evidence statement was selected for the translocation action prescription (soundness)

Type system: Microsoft SQL Server 2019

Code definitions (4)
  • Canopy Cover
    Respondent saw evidence statement about canopy cover for translocation soundness argument
  • Timber
    Respondent saw evidence statement about timber for translocation soundness argument
  • Meadow
    Respondent saw evidence statement about meadows for translocation soundness argument
  • NA
    Respondent did not proceed far enough through the survey to be assigned an experimental condition for the trans_argument question.
Units
number number dimensionless number dimensionless 1 dimensionless number, i.e., ratio, count
Related Datasets

No related dataset codes found in the EML text fields.

Related Publications

No publication citations found in this EML file.

Related Files
Intellectual Rights

Data Use Agreement:

The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. This Data Set is released under the Creative Commons license CC BY "Attribution" (see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Creative Commons license CC BY - Attribution is a license that allows others to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon your work (even commercially), as long as you are credited for the original creation. This license accommodates maximum dissemination and use of licensed materials.

It is considered professional conduct and an ethical obligation to acknowledge the work of other scientists. The Data User is asked to provide attribution of the original work if this data package is shared in whole or by individual parts or used in the derivation of other products. A recommended citation is provided for each Data Set in the Andrews LTER data catalog (see: http://andlter.forestry.oregonstate.edu/data/catalog/datacatalog.aspx). A generic citation is also provided for this Data Set on the website https://portal.edirepository.org in the summary metadata page. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator.

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed and all data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data.

General acknowledgement: Data were provided by the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest research program, funded by the National Science Foundation's Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB 2025755), US Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and Oregon State University.

Licensed

License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License

Identifier: CC-BY-4.0

URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Maintenance

Maintenance update frequency: notPlanned

Description

  • An update history is logged and maintained with each new version of every dataset.

Change History

  • Version1 (2023-10-17)
    Study code and preliminary metadata established
  • Version2 (2023-11-07)
    Original creation of the entity. Several of the attributes where long text, so created entity 2 for these.